Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (829326)	1/11/2015 1:56:42 PM
From: longnshort	1 Recommendation Recommended By locogringo Respond to of 1575396

"mbut the pipeline goes over the Ogallala aquifer:" other pipelines already go over it, you are being grubered

To: tejek who wrote (829326)	1/13/2015 12:52:43 AM
From: RMF	2 Recommendations Recommended By Brumar89 TideGlider Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575396

In a perfect world we wouldn't use ANY fossil fuels. But we AREN'T in a perfect world and we DO use them and now with the price of oil down 50% we will use MORE of them. And Keystone WILL bring a lot of jobs to the U.S. Refineries are already running at capacity so we'll need more refineries and more workers in each of them. More workers to fill the tankers. More tankers, more workers to man the tankers. More people to do the extra paperwork. As far as Ogallala, it probably won't matter because that aquifer will still be good for the next 30 years or so until global warming changes the climate so much that all the crops in the western hemisphere will be grown in Canada anyway because drought and excessive heat will make it impossible to grow anything in the west of the U.S.