Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Obama - Clinton Disaster -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mongo2116 who wrote (96656)	1/13/2015 1:15:16 PM
From: John	2 Recommendations Recommended By Honey_Bee slowmo Respond to of 103300

Instead of projecting your sick fantasies in the forum, why won't you honestly answer this question that I have repeatedly posed to you? If you had a very young daughter, and you learned that she was lost and alone at night in a large city, would you feel more at ease knowing that she was in a city that was 100% White or 100% Black? Even Jesse Jackson would answer the question honestly, so why won't you? Most rational and logical people would recognize that the defenseless little girl, regardless of her race, would stand a much better chance of being helped to safety and cared for if the city were 100% White as opposed to 100% Black. In the latter case, she would have a much risk of being assaulted, raped and murdered. And let's be honest... As much as Blacks publicly pi$$ and moan about Whites, if a Black family -- a rarity, I know, but bear with me -- if a Black family had a young daughter lost and alone, they would hope that she was lost in the "good part of town" rather than the "bad part of town". What is your response to this scenario? Please be honest and support your answer. Thank you.