SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Snowshoe who wrote (109796)1/17/2015 9:28:07 PM
From: Elroy Jetson2 Recommendations

Recommended By
clochard
dvdw©

  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 217544
 
Dear God in heaven, everyone seems to have thought that the Swiss Franc was a guaranteed one-way trade, borrow a billion Francs at nearly zero percent interest and buy almost anything else.

The one pressure the Swiss central bank probably received from bankers, which I hadn't thought of is pretty obvious.

All of the unsavory people who had deposited trillions of Francs in Swiss banks may decided to remove their deposits if the Swiss Franc were to follow the Euro down in value.

I still think there must some large investors who won by borrowing Euros and purchasing Francs.

But people are odd. Many years ago the roulette wheel at the casino at Baden Baden came up Red 36 times in a row, and it wiped-out all of the betters as there was a mad rush to bet on Black. Only the casino won.



To: Snowshoe who wrote (109796)1/18/2015 12:42:44 AM
From: Haim R. Branisteanu1 Recommendation

Recommended By

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 217544
 
Very sad, I can imagine how many small investors got wiped out

I do think that this move by SNB is not right as a understatement

The psychopathic attitude of a public servant is astonishing. I would not buy the notion that they were unaware of the damage they inflicted and I tend to believe that is was done on purpose due the malice desire

The more I read of the damage inflicted the more I am sadden, after all I see it now as a barbaric gesture of a public servant that acted recklessly destroying wealth on one side and transferring same to the other side by the strike of a pen

The question is why do it this way and not in a gradual way with plenty of hints of your intentions.