SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : President Barack Obama -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tejek who wrote (148342)1/20/2015 2:13:14 PM
From: RetiredNow  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 149319
 
There is hype and then there are facts. I have said all along that this administration's policies for recovery have all been about enriching the 1% at the expense of the 99%. Ask yourself this: why all of a sudden does Obama feel like he needs to do something for the Middle Class? Well, it's because he knows they have been hurting disproportionately during his Presidency due to his policies, and he knows he'd better do something to give the Dems a chance at the next Presidency. He gets the diagnosis correct, but as usual, gets the solution wrong. I have told all of you that printing money will enrich all of the asset holders, like me, and the banks, but it will be ruinous for the 99%. And it has been. Obama now recognizes this and he wants to tax the rich and the banks to give money to the Middle Class. What he should be doing is stop all the monetary manipulation, which is nothing more than the mother of all trickle down exercises, and let the rich people sink or swim on their own. They don't need a bailout. I don't know why Obama bailed out the rich and the big banks. Why didn't he bail out the 99%? Because he doesn't care or can't figure out how to do it in a sustainable way. That's why. You fool yourselves into thinking he does, but his actions speak far louder than his words. Now he's going to implement yet another socialist redistribution program to attempt to correct his mistakes of the last 6 years, instead of going back to capitalism, which works far better to spread the wealth. What a buffoon!

-----------
This is why Obama is so concerned about the middle class

money.cnn.com

By Tami Luhby @Luhby January 20, 2015: 11:01 AM ET



NEW YORK (CNNMoney)
It's not hard to see why income inequality and middle class woes are in the spotlight these days.The numbers tell the story. The richest Americans have seen their fortunes rise in recent decades. Everyone else has either been treading water or falling backwards.

That's in large part because the wealthy have benefited from the soaring stock market and corporate profits. But wages, which the middle class depends on, have stagnated.

This is why President Obama and politicians around the country are looking to give an income boost to the middle class and working Americans. The president wants to give a $500 tax credit to working couples to help them pay for child care or commuting expenses. He plans to outline his middle class agenda in the State of the Union on Tuesday.



When it comes to income, the wealthy have captured a disproportionate share of the gains in recent decades. While they suffered steeper losses during recessions, they more than made it up during the subsequent recoveries, according to Emmanuel Saez, professor at University of California, Berkeley.

In the most recent recovery, for instance, the income of the Top 1% soared 31.4%. The rest of America saw a miniscule 0.4% increase between 2009 and 2012, according to the most recent data available.


The middle class, meanwhile, has given up all the income gains it enjoyed during the tech boom of the late 1990s and the housing boom of the mid 2000s.

This, along with the lack of growth of average hours earnings in recent years, is one of the main reasons why Americans say they aren't feeling the economic recovery.


Wealth has followed a similar pattern. The richest 20% have seen their wealth nearly double over the past 30 years, while the middle class' net worth has ticked up less than 13%, according to Edward Wolff, professor at New York University. The poorest Americans have fallen into debt.

The rich now control 89% of the nation's wealth, up from 81% in 1983. The middle class' share has fallen to 12% from 18%.