Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cogito who wrote (40326)	12/17/1997 4:18:00 PM
From: Cogito	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 58324

* OT * This news item kills me. Microsoft is seeking to have the District Court's decision that they cannot require licensees of Windows 95 to also install Internet Explorer 4.0 overturned. Their reason? I quote: ""The District Court has forced Microsoft to license an operating system that is plainly deficient and that Microsoft should not be required to have associated with its name." As I recall, the original release version of Windows 95 did not include Internet Explorer 4.0. Was that a "plainly deficient" operating system? Oh. Wait a minute. Of course it was. Never mind. - Allen