Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (831896)	1/23/2015 5:03:48 PM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578299

If You're Wondering Why We Don't Take Climate Change Alarmists Seriously, This Picture Pretty Much Explains It. Written by Mockarena This is absolutely perfect. It is true that the SAME people now up in arms about alleged warming were once warning about global cooling. Plus the predictions (snow a thing of the past, more hurricanes, etc etc etc) have failed. Why should anyone believe people who contradict their past predictions.

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (831896)	1/23/2015 5:32:15 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	2 Recommendations Recommended By Brumar89 locogringo Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578299

I would say only a severely retarded person would quote an Mit Professor and then use a hotwopper asshole to somehow argue whatever. And even a severely retarded person who posts a link to an article that says NOAA said something that is 62% surely false is true, would defend with no legitimate source of data showing NOAA did not say something that is 62% surely false. But then liars and the severely retarded never argue with facts. Where is what the Cult of De Nile defined. I could see where you are the read deal in being one of the highest priests in your own mind.