Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kim W. Brasington who wrote (7462)	12/17/1997 5:28:00 PM
From: Millracer	Respond to of 20681

Dissenter Honor Roll of The Week: In first place, Michael Grasso with 30 points for artistic ability and 20 points for technical merit for a total of 50. In second place, Knight with 20 points for artistic ability and 10 points for technical merit for a total of 30 points. In last place, with only five points for artistic ability and 5 points for technical merit, for a total of 10 points is Thall. Artistic merit=tone of thread voice. Technical merit=quality of questions.

To: Kim W. Brasington who wrote (7462)	12/18/1997 12:22:00 AM
From: Bear Down	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20681

<<What these higher numbers in relationship to lower numbers serve to emphasize is not the material, but the process that has the capability of unlocking the precious metals from the Franklin Lake playa.> That would be 100% correct if it were on a split homogeneous sample. Then they would not only emphasize that it is not the material, but would also prove the "process" OK maybe releasing all numbers would confuse the public but a PR saying Naxos is pleased to announce that recent tests done on raw FL material show a 500% increase in recoverable gold when identical material is treated with the J/L naxos proprietry process prior to standard fire assay as opposed to just doing SFA I know I have beaten this issue to death and I am sure before ledoux gives Naxos the OK on the "process" they will teest it thoroughly. I just think if Naxos would have asked for these type of results when they recieved the June samples all the questions as to whether J/L is hocus pocus or an actual scientif discovery would be answered. Can you answer the question as to the White/Lett connection?? Or was that just a different process that mr lett attempted to sell naxos?? Forgive my memory, but how large were the samples that yielded 3 gpt from the most recent PR?