SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mary Cluney who wrote (42582)12/17/1997 5:49:00 PM
From: Hank Stamper  Respond to of 186894
 
Ouch!
"voodoo analysis"?
Ohh, ouch.

David Todtman



To: Mary Cluney who wrote (42582)12/17/1997 7:13:00 PM
From: Charles Skeen  Respond to of 186894
 
Re: <<< not really into voodoo analysis and psuedo forward looking mathematics >>>

Price/earnings ratios may be voodoo analysis to you, but not to the majority of investors in Intel. If that is not of interest to you, I think that you are the one wasting your time on this thread, plus the time of many others who have to pick their way through the chaff that gets dumped here.

JMO, Charlie.



To: Mary Cluney who wrote (42582)12/17/1997 7:54:00 PM
From: lbs  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
You should take all your money out of the stock market. If you think the historical range of a stock's PE is "voodoo analysis and psuedo forward looking mathematics" you are in way over your head.

Check out mutual funds



To: Mary Cluney who wrote (42582)12/17/1997 8:13:00 PM
From: Shahen Petrosian  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
> voodoo analysis and psuedo forward looking mathematics.

I feel this way about TA as well. I think it stems from a human need
to make sense of and feel in control of the chaos on financial charts.
Chaos is then reduced to neater geometric shapes and gaps and candlesticks.
Unfortunately TA is also interpretive which shelters its credibility when
it fails. I'll stick to fundamentals.

Shahen Petrosian