Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (833208)	1/29/2015 2:45:17 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Respond to of 1575427

WR, I guess you didn't go to the link. I did see the link. No details, no descriptions on what the "study" counted in terms of storms vs. tsunamis. Just a few data points that shows nothing other than the normal fluctuations of storm activity in the region. I don't know that climatologists specified just the US. That's the thing about these so-called climatologists. They are never specific when it comes to these doomsday predictions. But the context of Hurricane Katrina was clear. WE (as in here in America) would see more hurricanes. That didn't happen, so what do these shysters do? "Look over there! Lots of hurricanes! Must be global warming!" It's not convincing at all. But then again, those you can't convince, you simply label a "denier." Like a religious zealot. Tenchusatsu