Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (833347)	1/30/2015 1:11:06 AM
From: RMF	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1578534

So you were born about 1944? I don't think I'd describe either Eisenhower or Nixon as progressive. I wouldn't describe Obama as "anything". He's like a placeholding blip in American history.

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (833347)	1/30/2015 8:49:22 AM
From: D.Austin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578534

If Obama had been as progressive as either of them...... Now that is some funny shit right there. . . Eisenhower with all due respect was an amateur to politics and the perfect choice in a time of our history to give the impression of fair elections, not selections. . . "Ike and Dick make us sick". Check out "I like Taft, but Taft can't win." Obama just like Ike was as used and placed in the presidency to keep this f#%ked up progressive bowel movement going. The difference with Ike is he had no idea. From the President of Columbia University to the President of the United States... Then there's Obama.