Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (833388)	1/30/2015 11:12:25 AM
From: Thomas A Watson	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1578270

the blindness of the abjectly stupid on parade. "while the Midwest and Mississippi Valley were cool." mean there was not any global warming. glob·al 'glob?l/ adjective of or relating to the whole world; worldwide. the only somewhat closer to valid measurements of the global temperature comes from satellites that actually cover huge area of the globe as opposed the 1 millionth area sample size of all the ground stations mathematically masturbated together.

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (833388)	1/30/2015 11:35:22 AM
From: Brumar89	1 Recommendation Recommended By D.Austin Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578270

HCN's own unadjusted data show that 2014 was cool year. 2014 Was The Least Hot Year On Record In The US Posted on January 30, 2015 by stevengoddard Two thirds of the US was below normal temperature last summer. Current Climate Summary Maps – Powered by ACIS – High Plains Regional Climate Center The percentage of US HCN stations which reached 90 degrees in 2014, was the smallest on record. The highest percentage occurred in 1931, when almost every single station reached 90 degrees. The area of the US which is hot has been plummeting since the 1930s. This is the exact opposite of the 100% fraudulent NCDC climate extremes index (CEI) which reports that the region of the country with unusually hot days has increased to record levels. High and Low Temperatures \| Climate Change \| US EPA My graph was generated using the identical HCN data set used in the NCDC/EPA graph. The difference is that I use the actual thermometer data, whereas CEI uses “adjusted” data. The EPA has another graph on the same web page which directly contradicts the NCDC CEI graph above. High and Low Temperatures \| Climate Change \| US EPA The area of the US over 100 degrees and 110 degrees also peaked in the 1930’s, and has plummeted since. These are critical indicators, because they are not affected by time of observation bias (TOBS) and show unequivocally that NCDC data tampering is incorrect. The reason that the CEI is wrong, is because they use adjusted data. This is a smoking gun that the adjustments are fraudulent.