SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : BORL: Time to BUY! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Key West who wrote (8077)12/17/1997 7:28:00 PM
From: Al Shelinsky  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10836
 
Gene,
I would be interested in the breakdown of institutional buying. Also, when you spoke to Ms. Fisher, did she say to what time period she was referring regarding "significant institutional accumulation of late"? Thanks.

Al



To: Key West who wrote (8077)12/17/1997 10:05:00 PM
From: Bill Tucker  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10836
 
Kathleen Fisher is the Chief Financial Officer.
The fact that she was very up-beat confirms my suspicion that we
may well be having a very good quarter indeed.
This thought stems from one comment Del Yocam made to Bruce Francis
during his CNBC interview.
It relates to the figure of 47% being the client/server-enterprise
% of total sales. I think he was refering to likely '97 results.
As this was down from 55% in Q2, I initally felt a bit disappointed.
However, on reflection, I think it is probably indicative of
something completely different.
The drop-off is NOT a decline in C/S sales but rather a result of
very good sales from the rest.
Remember DY has already made a Press Release on how good JBuilder
sales have been. Often, in the past, BORL has received a lot of
buying (late May 1996 for example) anticipating good results, only
to have these dashed by warnings or reality. Maybe, this will be
the one time when the opposite, weak retail selling, will result
in a positive warning sometime in early Jan.
Here is my analysis.
1. No increase in C/S sales during Q3.
Sales % Client Server Rest
Q1 41,970,000 .47 19,725,900 22,244,100
Q2 42,500,000 .55 23,375,000 + 18.5% 19,125,000 - 14.0%
Q3 ??? 56,968,085 23,375,000 33,593,085

1997 141,438,085 .47 66,475,900 74,962,185

2. Decline in C/S sales to that of Q1.

Q1 41,970,000 .47 19,725,900 22,244,100
Q2 42,500,000 .55 23,375,000 + 18.5% 19,125,000 - 14.0%
Q3 ??? 49,204,043 19,725,900 29,478,143

1997 133,674,043 .47 62,826,800 70,847,243

3. David Miller's estimate of 43M.

Q1 41,970,000 .47 19,725,900 22,244,100
Q2 42,500,000 .55 23,375,000 + 18.5% 19,125,000 - 14.0%
Q3 ??? 43,000,000 16,810,000 - 28.1% 26,190,000

1997 127,470,000 .47 59,910,900 67,559,100

I think 3. is very unlikely. In fact, I see no reason to assume that
C/S sales have not themselves increased.
However, if so, the numbers become so bullish that one does not wish
to seem really way out.(e.g. 7% increase to 25M gives sales of 60M).
If anyone on the thread is close to a security analyst, I would be
most interested in receiving a reaction on the above.
Anyway YOU ALL I thought it was about time someone tried to perk up
things around here.
To all us holders of Jan 10's, we may not be dead yet.



To: Key West who wrote (8077)12/18/1997 12:26:00 AM
From: Kashish King  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10836
 
I have news for you, Kathleen Fisher doesn't even know when earnings are to be released and as such is really something of an embarrassment for an IR person. That's my observation, for whatever it's worth he said, leaving the bait exposed and vulnerable.