Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (833868)	2/2/2015 1:00:42 PM
From: Wharf Rat	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1579893

His natural conclusion is not nature's conclusion. It's only what deniers conclude. Here's another example... The original title of Rose's original article was “Global warming is just HALF what we said: World's top climate scientists admit computers got the effects of greenhouse gases wrong.” the Mail has edited the story significantly to correct astonishing errors in Rose's original, which were regurgitated by Rush Limbaugh on Tuesday. “World's top climate scientists confess: Global warming is just QUARTER what we thought - and computers got the effects of greenhouse gases wrong.” desmogblog.com Scientists take the Mail on Sunday to task over claim that warming is half what IPCC said last time 16 Sep 2013, 15:40 Roz Pidcock The Mail on Sunday yesterday claimed the international climate community is conceding the world hasn't warmed as much since the middle of last century as previously thought. We ask climate scientists what they make of the story. carbonbrief.org