SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Microcap Kitchen Canadian Stocks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: diddlysquatz who wrote (33336)2/4/2015 1:39:28 PM
From: educated.idiot5 Recommendations

Recommended By
BlackList_
diddlysquatz
madmax123
maki
Pinkman

  Respond to of 49402
 
I think the rule is mostly in place for the 2nd reason, but nonetheless I agree that it's a ridiculous rule to have.

Someone with $100,000 in liquid assets can probably afford to lose $5,000 in a private placement. And more importantly, if people want to be reckless with their money there's not much you can do to stop them. Is the government or a regulatory agency going to actively prevent and bar individuals from opening a small business unless they have millions in assets and can thus afford to take financial risk? Are they going to prevent people from spending $50,000 to get a post secondary education because they have very little money today and that education might not lead to a job? Are they going to prevent individuals from opening self-directed brokerage accounts, which allow them the opportunity to put 100% of their savings into only one or two money losing junior miners?

The solution IMO is making the teaching of personal finance a core part of our education system, which it most certainly currently is not. But being forward thinking has almost never been a strong suit of any government body or regulatory agency. And so what we get instead is a bunch of reactive red tape that ironically unduly disadvantages the very group of people that they are trying to protect.



To: diddlysquatz who wrote (33336)2/4/2015 1:55:47 PM
From: yasirsiddiqi3 Recommendations

Recommended By
Acton
Chunger
longz

  Respond to of 49402
 
Diddly - when are you going on Market Call? Its about time.



To: diddlysquatz who wrote (33336)2/4/2015 2:32:41 PM
From: Ploni  Respond to of 49402
 
And it's only a million loonies -- it's not as though it's real money.

(Just kidding; I wish I had a million loonies.)



To: diddlysquatz who wrote (33336)2/4/2015 4:52:32 PM
From: forbrydelsen  Respond to of 49402
 
if they could change it to be a percentage of your financial assets that you were permitted to invest in such opportunities, then that would benefit a lot of people and keep the risk manageable.



To: diddlysquatz who wrote (33336)2/4/2015 5:11:13 PM
From: Calaboca8 Recommendations

Recommended By
Boolish
diddlysquatz
educated.idiot
Ivan Inkling
JamesJa

and 3 more members

  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 49402
 
The accredited investor rule is a means by which the government seeks to protect naive investors from losing money. Yet the very same government promotes lotteries and casinos where "investors" can blow their brains out.