Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : A New Age In Gold Refining -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Michael J. Wendell who wrote (332)	12/18/1997 6:22:00 AM
From: Henry Volquardsen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 672

Michael, I would like to add my name to those thanking you for your extremely interesting posts. I find it amazing that controversy could attach itself to such obvious common sense.

To: Michael J. Wendell who wrote (332)	12/18/1997 8:25:00 AM
From: go4it	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 672

Hello Mike and welcome back. A person had asked me what I thought about your previous post of production versus proving resources. There is no argueing the need for an economical and reliable recovery process and I am one who took that for granted too much that a recovery process was there. I just wish to point out that assays/reserves become important after the recovery process is found when an investor is trying to figure out what a company is worth. Without the assay/reserve numbers available then the company can only be based on recovery / profits which is fine but any deviation in such production would lead to a very volitile stock price. Personally I think they are both important to share holders of a company. First for getting the metals at a profit and then for providing maximum value for the shares. Once again ...... Welcome back