SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The coming US dollar crisis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Pogeu Mahone who wrote (56943)2/5/2015 1:23:13 PM
From: maceng2  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 71406
 
OK , so were you out protesting in the streets when the USA (via the CIA project) appointed this guy in charge of Iran ?

"Sixty years later, the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency admitted that it staged the coup which toppled the democratically elected government of Iranian Prime Minister Mohammed Mossadegh, replacing him with the more pliable Shah of Iran, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi."

http://www.ibtimes.com/cia-admits-iran-1953-coup-revelations-unlikely-thaw-us-tehran-relations-1390867

The Shah was an out and out Nazi, and this was the guy the USA put in charge of Iran after the citizens of that sovereign country had the mistaken idea that a democracy was what it should be running.

crimesofwar.org

The Ayatollah was blowback for that asinine foreign policy, and things seem to have just gotten worse since then.

Sadly, I don't think Israel believes in a democracy either.

.... and we are supposed to drink the standard kool aide that Muslims are the bad guys and the State of Israel are the good guys?

I maybe pro peace, but I am not above thinking a few countries and populations need to be bumped off (starting with the Falkland islanders) to get us there, and therefore not necessarily an anti nuclear weapons campaigner.

You see its more like "can the British taxpayer afford to keep the Falklanders" rather then what the Falkland Islanders think and how they voted. If I remember correctly, we could have resettled every islander, and every blessed sheep on those islands, paying them about $200,000 each and still saved a lot of money and thousands (mainly Argentinian) lives and countless miseries by avoiding that war. I thought that back in 1982, thought about is since, and have not changed my mind. Two hundred grand was a decent slice of cash back in 1982. A sheep could have afforded a nice pen and some decent forage for life on that kind of money.

... and best of luck convincing the rest of the 7 billion on the planet that its the Muslims that are the bad guys, a good portion of them are Muslims at the last count as far as I know. -lol-

en.wikipedia.org