SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TopCat who wrote (28553)12/18/1997 12:36:00 AM
From: Pugs  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 55532
 
TC
Only that the credibility of a few us will be challenged as things progress. I have nothing to hide, I have a web-site that has my name & E-mail address on it. I already get tons of threatening E-mails, phone-calls, etc. But, It's important that I, riley, all the longs be open & upfront about ourselves TO A POINT. SMartin will hide in the shadows, so the obvious question that arises is , "what does he have to hide?" I don't want that over my head, I'll respond to them, to a point, I won't sacrifice my safety or livelihood, but if its' the silly things brought up...no problem



To: TopCat who wrote (28553)12/18/1997 1:08:00 AM
From: s martin  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 55532
 
Pug's nonsensical statement that MK is a "self-proclaimed" broker was the reason for the comment regarding his "self-proclaimed" status as a pathgologist(sic)... it really has nothing to do with RMIL, other than to highlight the "misleading" nature of his remarks.

To: +Steve Borgdine (28438 )
From: +Pugs Wednesday, Dec 17 1997 12:43PM EST
Reply # of 28574

Or...."heads I win, tails you lose!"
AS far as Kugler is concerned, he's a self-proclaimed broker, who admits to talking to an admitted short seller of RMIL from Principals' offices during Market hours. He has posted info here which has been proven to be , in the very least, misleading. He has asked RMIL longs to "sell" their shares.
15USC Chapter 2A sub.,i. 77q would, in the very least, suggest his actions to be 'unethical'.,
Pugs



To: TopCat who wrote (28553)12/18/1997 2:56:00 AM
From: Steve Borgdine  Respond to of 55532
 
"Just curious, why do you feel a need to respond to these questions about your involvement in the medical community? I can't think of one reason why this relates to your investment in RMIL....can you?"

Dear TC - You prop your digs up on this thread way too early. You need to proofread them in order to elliminate that everpresent sophomoric, rushed tone. Study MK and SM some more. Learn how to exude the appearance of presenting objective DD by acutually showing real data with a slight twist so that the data insinuates questions about RMIL and Morgan and Riley and the Cartel. Heck, TC, you won't be able to sleep with a clear conscience unless you can poison this thread like the big boys do.
Steve B