Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (838077)	2/21/2015 1:02:52 PM
From: Wharf Rat	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1579810

2005 was close to the hottest in 100K years. BTW, after he said that, Kyoto was passed, and some countries actually started reducing their footprint. Good thing they listened to him.

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (838077)	2/21/2015 1:06:24 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1579810

>> That also means 2014 was likely the hottest the Earth has been in millennia, and perhaps as much as 100,000 years. For someone like me, who really doesn't follow this issue, the above statement appears to represent a non-sequitur. Can you explain to me the rationale that allows you to conclude, assuming arguendo, that 2014 was the hottest the Earth has been in millennia, how one concludes it is the hottest in 100,000 years?