Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : Zonagen (zona) - good buy? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill Wexler who wrote (1098)	12/18/1997 11:39:00 PM
From: Bruce Rosen	Respond to of 7041

Bill, you said in your post referenced above: <<Dan Ramsey is a paid shill for Zonagen. Period.>> You however give no information to back up this claim, or is anyone with a positive opinion of Zonagen, by definition, a paid shill? <<This is nothing but lame, pseudoscientific garbage. Furthermore, Zonagen's implication that they can derive some value by patenting a formulation/delivery-system for an ancient generic drug which is useless for the treatment of ED is extremely misleading....or a bad joke.>> Zonagen has been and continues to be advised by some of the leading experts in the field of ED. Their tests were conducted by PPD Pharmaco, a large and respected testing organization. The data was examined closely by Schering-Plough. They believe that they can derive value from Vasomax, even in the face of disagreement from you. It is not a difficult choice for me to decide who to rely on here. <<You may insult me and call me a liar all you wish, >> I do not wish to call you or anyone else a liar. When you make unsubstantiated allegations which, in some cases, I know to be untrue, I feel that I have a right to state that. It seems to me that your style is to attack anyone who offers opinions which conflict with yours, by calling them shills and hypsters. I prefer to discuss facts and give opinions that have a reasonable justification, not to engage in personal attacks. << In my opinion, Zonagen has perpetrated a fraud by hiring scientifically-illiterate stock touts to push this toilet paper while knowing damn well that they had zilch.>> Care to name names and give some reasons for the above attack? If not, perhaps the toilet paper reference would be better used in wiping away your shrill and strident words.