SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (838967)2/24/2015 5:37:00 PM
From: Bill  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1574106
 
Joe, please update yourself. CBS released the tapes last night showing the violence and shootings. The scene was exactly as O'Reilly had described. And showed both Corn and Enberg to be liars.



To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (838967)2/24/2015 5:40:47 PM
From: scamp  Respond to of 1574106
 
Quit being so obstinate JF and accept the new open minded definition of "war zone". "War Zone" during a specific war or conflict can be expanded to mean any violent interaction between people. In fact, it can mean almost anything you want it to mean so long as it advances your thinking and ideology.



To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (838967)2/24/2015 5:45:49 PM
From: longnshort  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574106
 
watch the video



To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (838967)2/24/2015 5:51:53 PM
From: scamp  Respond to of 1574106
 
Watch the video and see if you can identify the Faulkland "war zone"

No Faulkland "war zone' in the video. Only a bunch of reporters covering a violent demonstration in Buenos Aires. I guess O'Reilly was just confused when he developed a "war zone" narrative to explain his coverage of the Buenos Aires riot. You see, Bill's never been in real combat and doesn't know the difference between real violent demonstrations and real "war zones" where men are being slaughtered with modern killing machines.