SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : How Quickly Can Obama Totally Destroy the US? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Qualified Opinion who wrote (14105)2/27/2015 9:55:34 PM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
Full Press Conference : Black ministers stand with Israel.






To: Qualified Opinion who wrote (14105)2/28/2015 4:05:35 AM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
Black Privilege: Students Get SAT Bonus Points for Being Black or Hispanic – Asians Are Penalized

.................................................................................
Gateway Pundit ^ | February 25, 2015 | Jim Hoff



To: Qualified Opinion who wrote (14105)2/28/2015 4:06:20 AM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
President Obama Breaks Into Tears as He Says Goodbye to Holder

..................................................................................
Breitbart TV ^ | February 27, 2015 | Pam Key

Friday, President Barack Obama spoke at the portrait unveiling ceremony for outgoing U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder, which led to the commander-in-chief breaking into tears that he wiped away as he finished his remarks.

The president said, “Having good men in a position of power and authority, who are willing to fight for what is right, that is a rare thing, a powerful thing. That’s something that shapes our future in ways we don’t even understand, we don’t always imagine. It made me very proud.




To: Qualified Opinion who wrote (14105)2/28/2015 9:44:08 PM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
TED CRUZ: ‘WE SHOULD REPEAL EVERY WORD OF COMMON CORE’



To: Qualified Opinion who wrote (14105)3/2/2015 10:15:04 AM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
Goodbye to Eric Holder, With One Question
..............................................................................
PowerLine
by John Hinderaker
Posted on February 28, 2015

Excerpt:

Eric Holder
is on his way out, thankfully. In a farewell interview with Politico, he demonstrated again why he was unfit to be Attorney General. He trashes his predecessor, Alberto Gonzales:


I had to take a Justice Department that was in shambles, you know, when I got here: political hiring, political firing, exclusion of career people from decision making for political reasons.

Someone in Gonzales’s Justice Department tried to bring a little diversity to the almost monolithically liberal department by hiring a few conservatives, and got slapped down for it. Holder continues:


And so, I had to rebuild the department, put in place people who I thought would share my — my view of what this department ought to be.

But wait! How is “put[ting] in place people who…would share my view of what this department ought to be” different from “political hiring”? In fact, it was Holder, not Gonzales, who brought an unprecedented degree of politicization to DOJ. But Politico’s Mike Allen, a fellow Democrat, fawns uncritically.

He asks Holder about the Michael Brown and Trayvon Martin cases:

MIKE ALLEN: Travyon Martin’s mother says George Zimmerman got away with murder. You’re writing a letter to Trayvon’s mother, his parents, what will it say?

AG. HOLDER: Well, I’m going to try to — it’s yeah — I’m going to pen a letter to them. -I’ve worked on it already, and I think I’d like to kind of keep that personal.

MIKE ALLEN: And it looks like no federal charges in Ferguson or Trayvon. I’m a young African-American. What do I think?

AG. HOLDER: Well, I would say, first, I would note I have not announced anything with regard to — to Ferguson. …

MIKE ALLEN: Mr. Attorney General, are the standards of the civil rights laws too high for you to make cases in instances like this?

AG. HOLDER: I mean that’s certainly something that I’m going to want to talk about before I leave. I think some serious consideration needs to be given to the standard of proof that has to be met before federal involvement is appropriate, and that’s something that I am going to be talking about before — before I leave office.

MIKE ALLEN: And in what sense have you come to realize that the standards in the civil rights laws are too high?

AG. HOLDER: Well, I think that if we adjust those standards, we can make the federal government a better backstop, make us more a part of the process in an appropriate way to reassure the American people that decisions are made by people who are really disinterested, and I think that if we make those adjustments, we will have that capacity.

Those pesky laws keep getting in the way! It is hard to imagine what Holder means by “standard of proof.” The laws they are talking about are criminal (principally 18 U.S.C. §242, which could apply to Ferguson, and 18 U.S.C. §249, which could apply to the Martin/Zimmerman case), and the standard of proof is beyond a reasonable doubt.

Finally, Allen asks Holder whether people opposed him because of his race:

MIKE ALLEN: Now, there clearly have been times more recently since then when you have felt disrespected on Capitol Hill. How much of that do you think relates to race?

AG. HOLDER: It’s hard to say. You know, hard to look into people’s minds, you know, their hearts.

MIKE ALLEN: But were there times when you thought that was a piece of it?

AG. HOLDER: Yeah, there have been times when I thought that’s at least a piece of it.

MIKE ALLEN: Now, the piece of it that was racial, how did that make you feel?


This is the kind of tough questioning that Democrats get from “reporters.” A more appropriate question would have been, Since pretty much everyone who holds a high federal office gets criticized, what reason do you have to think that criticism of you had anything to do with race?

But I actually have a different question for Eric Holder: Your predecessor, Alberto Gonzales, was mercilessly savaged by Democrats. In fact, you savaged him in this very interview. Were Democrats’ criticisms of Gonzales based on race? And if not, why not?

Link





To: Qualified Opinion who wrote (14105)3/2/2015 12:48:04 PM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
Obama Believes He Alone Is The Law In America .........................................................................................................................................................................
02/27/2015
news.investors.com

Rule Of Law: First, the president issues unlawful executive orders giving illegal immigrants amnesty. Then, he dares an equal branch of government to vote on his orders' legality so he can veto it. Is he establishing a monarchy?

While speaking at a town hall meeting Wednesday night at Florida International University, President Obama clearly indicated that he believes he is the final authority on law in this country. He will not tolerate dissent.

"If Mr. McConnell, the leader of the Senate, and the Speaker of the House, John Boehner, want to have a vote on whether what I'm doing is legal or not, they can have that vote. I will veto that vote, because I'm absolutely confident that what we're doing is the right thing to do," he told a group organized by Democratic Rep. Jose Diaz-Balart.

In November, Obama announced a set of unilateral actions to change the immigration system. Government agencies were ordered not to enforce the law against up to 5 million illegal immigrants in the country. He also declared that they would not be subject to deportation and were to be handed green cards.

There was no vote in Congress. No consultation with the House and Senate. No law cited that gave him the authority. Just his word.

A month ago, we wondered if Obama was "so hellbent on amnesty for illegals he'll resort to nullifying and even breaking the law." Today, we know that he is.

Not even a federal judge's ruling has stopped him from making and unmaking law as he sees fit. On Feb. 16, Southern Texas District Judge Andrew Hanen issued a temporary injunction against the administration's executive lawmaking. "No, Mr. President," said the George W. Bush appointee, "you and your party's long-term political agenda are not above the law."

The administration wants Hanen's order lifted, but one should assume that even if the courts don't rule Obama's way, the White House will eventually do as it wishes and challenge the courts to stop it, just as it has taunted Congress.

Several times during Obama's six years in office he has insisted he's not a king able to act alone. He said it right up until he began to overtly behave as one.

House Speaker John Boehner's office counted 22 times that Obama said "he couldn't ignore or create his own immigration law."

Yet at a time of his choosing, the president decided he could indeed create his own immigration law, just as he made changes to the Affordable Care Act as if it were his own set of commandments handed down from on high.

Obama is the president who said all he needed was a pen and a phone, that he wasn't going to wait around for Congress to act.

He's the Oval Office occupant who, while visiting Monticello, Thomas Jefferson's home in Charlottesville, Va., a year ago with French President Francois Hollande, declared that it's a "good thing as a president, I can do whatever I want."

We said then and still believe today that if he meant that quip to be a joke, "it's a bad one, for it accurately describes the psyche of a president who governs by executive order and regulation."

A little more than a year after Obama's re-election, the Washington Times reported that "from immigration to the minimum wage, congressional Democrats and liberal activists ... urged Mr. Obama to declare an end run around Capitol Hill, assert executive authority and make as much progress as he can on the expansive agenda he laid out for his second term."

They knew with whom they were dealing.

Obama well represents the political left, which has no time or respect for constitutional limits, the rule of law or power shared among the three branches.

Today's leftists, loosely defined as "progressives," want raw political power to enact their agenda. And from Obama they're getting it.




Read More At Investor's Business Daily: news.investors.com



To: Qualified Opinion who wrote (14105)3/3/2015 5:07:49 AM
From: joseffy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 16547
 
8th Grader Suspended for Informing Classmates of Standardized Test ‘Opt-Out’ (Santa Fe NM)

A New Mexico eighth-grader was suspended from school for letting her classmates know that they could opt out of the state's new online standardized test.

12-year-old Adelina Silva printed out the forms from her own school's website and was rewarded with a trip to the principal's office.

Adelina and her mother, Jacqueline Ellvinger, appeared on "Fox and Friends" this morning to explain what happened and why Adelina was punished.

"I wanted the parents to know that they had the option to let the student either take the test or not," Adelina said.

"I was sent to the principal's office for an hour and 20 minutes and then at the end of the day she ended up suspending me."

The school district released a statement, saying, "Santa Fe Public Schools supports a parent's right to opt his or her child out of state-mandated standardized testing ... no students in the district have been disciplined for supporting or promoting this district policy of a parent's right to opt their child out of testing."

Ellvinger said her daughter's rights were violated even though she didn't do anything wrong.

"She did absolutely nothing wrong and yet they are making her feel like she did," Ellvinger said, adding that she's "furious" and has spoken to the state's senators.

Despite the negative reaction from the school, Adelina said she would do the same thing again.