Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Solon who wrote (66271)

2/28/2015 11:51:47 PM

From: Greg or e

Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 69300

"Why then does the atheist use that incredibly improbable explanation for the universe? Clearly, because it is his only chance of remaining an atheist." http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=29958793

"Chance did it!" That's the evolutionist's god of the gaps between their ears, argument!

"At this point we need a psychological explanation of the atheist rather than a logical explanation of the universe."

Pretty simple really...

"this is the condemnation, that the light has come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. For everyone practicing evil hates the light and does not come to the light, lest his deeds should be exposed. But he who does the truth comes to the light, that his deeds may be clearly seen, that they have been done in God.” John

To: Solon who wrote (66271)	3/1/2015 12:27:35 AM
From: Greg or e	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 69300

Darwin made it possible to be an intellectually fulfilled Eugenicist. Dawkins and Eugenics A leading high priest of evolution reveals its ugly side. creation.com After the gruesome unveiling of the Nazi death camps following Allied liberation, eugenics and other forms of social Darwinism slunk shamefacedly into the shadows. ... Dawkins himself now says that certain ideas of eugenics may not be that bad after all. In a letter to the editor of the Sunday Herald (Scotland), Dawkins says that, while one would not want to be seen agreeing with Hitler, eugenics can be practical and desirable. He writes that, ‘if you can breed cattle for milk yield, horses for running speed, and dogs for herding skill, why on Earth should it be impossible to breed humans for mathematical, musical or athletic ability?’1 ... "I wonder whether, some 60 years after Hitler’s death, we might at least venture to ask what the moral difference is between breeding for musical ability and forcing a child to take music lessons." ... As a consequence of this anti-life ethic advocated by Dawkins and Singer, some countries are already well embarked on the eugenic road, permitting genetic screening in IVF clinics, as well as pre-birth screening to permit undesirable traits to be weeded out by abortion. Note that in some countries, one common ‘undesirable trait’ is being female, which makes it bizarre that most of today’s feminists fanatically support abortion for any reason—see China Gender Imbalance Increases as Sex-Selection Abortions Continue.