Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bentway who wrote (840796)	3/5/2015 8:11:34 PM
From: joseffy	Respond to of 1574624

Holder Frames Ferguson PD For Racism Using Bogus 'Disparate Impact' Stats ........................................................................ Investors.com ^ \| March 5, 2015 \| IBD Editorial

To: bentway who wrote (840796)	3/5/2015 8:13:51 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1574624

>> Largest study of gay brothers homes in on 'gay genes' What you posted was an effort by the anti-science left wing to somehow offset the the large number of studies of identical twins. Obviously, you're dealing with statistical self-selection in the study you linked. It is really not something I want to get into in depth with a scientific nitwit. However, if you are interested I suggest you pursue the numerous studies and at least read their abstracts. You cannot establish the existence of a "gay gene" by examining two gay brothers. Because, of course, you have to be able to isolate the gene that is NOT present in those who are not gay. There have been efforts to "adjust" the truth through various means. But the bottom line is that until you can explain how two brothers with identical DNA and normally identical early environments, end up one homosexual and one heterosexual. Until scientists can explain this away there cannot be scientific proof of a genetic basis for homosexuality. Sorry, that's the end of the argument.