SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : How Quickly Can Obama Totally Destroy the US? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Shoot1st who wrote (14262)3/6/2015 11:13:00 PM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
Emails show Clinton aides running interference during Benghazi attack

3/6/2015
FOX ^

Emails obtained through a federal lawsuit show that two top aides to then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton were running interference internally during the 2012 Benghazi terror attack.

The aides were Philippe Reines, widely described as Clinton’s principal gate-keeper, and Cheryl Mills, who has been at Clinton's side for decades.

The emails show that while receiving updates about the assault as it happened, Mills told then-State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland to stop answering reporter questions about the status of Ambassador Chris Stevens, who was missing and later found dead.

Also littered throughout the State Department emails, obtained by conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch, are references to a so-called Benghazi Group. A diplomatic source told Fox News that was code inside the department for the so-called Cheryl Mills task force, whose job was damage control.

The effort to stop Nuland from answering reporter questions also may have contributed to confusion over the nature of the attack. Clinton that night had put out the first statement wrongly linking the attack to a supposed protest sparked by an obscure, anti-Islam YouTube video – but that was never updated that night.

"Cheryl Mills was instrumental in making sure the big lie was put out there," Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said.

Judicial Watch obtained the State Department emails through legal action. "What's notable thus far is we received no emails from or to [Hillary Clinton],” he said. “You have to wonder whether these aides went offline and were using secret accounts to communicate with her about Benghazi attack."

The emails emerged as Clinton fields criticism over revelations that she used personal email during her tenure as secretary. She is now asking the department to make public thousands of emails she has turned over.

On Friday, the State Department spokeswoman was pushed to explain how they will review the Clinton emails under the Freedom of Information Act, or FOIA, and what will be made public.

"We will use FOIA standards for the review," spokeswoman Marie Harf said. "What we determine is appropriate under those FOIA standards will be public."

Harf also was questioned on a State Department unclassified cable, obtained exclusively by Fox News. The cable shows in 2011, Clinton's office told employees not to use personal email for government business, citing security reasons -- while she carried out government business exclusively on private accounts.

"This isn't her best practice guidance,” Harf said. “Her name is at the bottom of the cable, as is practiced for cables coming from Washington … some think she wrote it, which is not accurate."

Nevertheless, cables sent under Clinton's electronic signature carry her authority.

Mills, meanwhile, is a focus of the select congressional committee investigating the Benghazi attacks. During congressional testimony, retired Adm. Mike Mullen, who helped lead the Accountability Review Board investigation into the attacks, confirmed under cross-examination that he personally warned Mills that a witness would be damaging to the department.

Critics say it is more evidence the Accountability Review Board, or ARB, was deeply flawed.



To: Shoot1st who wrote (14262)3/6/2015 11:14:31 PM
From: joseffy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 16547
 
Biden: Climate Change Denial Is Like ‘Denying Gravity’

.........................................................................
mediaite ^ | March 6, 2015 | Josh Feldman




To: Shoot1st who wrote (14262)3/9/2015 11:37:17 AM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
47 Republicans May Have Just Broken the Law By Writing An Outrageous Letter To Iran
The Daily Banter ^ | 03/09/2015 | Michael Luciano


Just when you thought congressional Republicans couldn’t look any more like a troupe of treacherous clowns hellbent on circus-ifying anything President Obama tries to do, they pull another bag of tricks from the trunk of their tiny car.

On Monday, 47 Republican senators signed an open letter addressed to the “Leaders of the Islamic Republic of Iran” on U.S. Senate letterhead. The correspondence basically indicated that Iran’s ongoing negotiations on its nuclear program with the Obama administration are an all but futile endeavor. The weirdest thing about the letter — other than the fact that it was written in the first place — is that it doesn’t address anything specific regarding Iran’s nuclear program. It advances no alternative proposals, it elucidates no conditions under which the GOP would assent to a deal of any kind, and thus, it offers no hope of resolving one of the biggest U.S. foreign policy challenges of the last 35 years.

You’d think considering the letter is official correspondence from Senate Republicans, it would’ve addressed specific leaders within the Iranian government such as Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, President Hassan Rouhani, or the members of the Guardian Council, but it does not. Regardless, the letter is unlike anything seen in recent memory. Not only does it explicitly attempt to undermine negotiations between the U.S. and Iran concerning the latter’s nuclear program, it’s written in an unbelievably condescending tone:



Never has a lesson in American civics been so patronizing, or nefarious for that matter. It’s ironic the GOP thinks Iran’s leaders need a primer in the U.S. Constitution, considering its 2008 presidential nominee had no idea as to which office in Iran actually holds ultimate power. (He still might not.)

No matter, the not very subtle implication here is that if any deal whatsoever is hammered out between Iran and the U.S., the Republicans will oppose it. Again, notice how the letter doesn’t explain the sort of agreement the GOP would accept. The reason for this is as depressing as it is ludicrous: No agreement between Iran and the U.S. is acceptable as far as the Republican Party and its de facto chief Iran strategist Benjamin Netanyahu are concerned. At least, none that involve Iran retaining a modicum of dignity as a sovereign state.

The senators’ letter is an unserious act of anti-diplomacy specifically designed to undermine the president’s efforts to conduct foreign affairs in his capacity as chief executive. As such, the correspondence tests the limits of the Logan Act, which reads in part,


“Any citizen of the United States, wherever he may be, who, without authority of the United States, directly or indirectly commences or carries on any correspondence or intercourse with any foreign government or any officer or agent thereof, with intent to influence the measures or conduct of any foreign government or of any officer or agent thereof, in relation to any disputes or controversies with the United States, or to defeat the measures of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.”
While the letter’s signatories are U.S. senators, that does not mean they have the “authority of the United States” as required by the law since when it comes to conducting foreign policy, the executive branch is the United States, taking into consideration the occasionalAdvice and Consent of the Senate” as prescribed by the Constitution. However, this letter is neither advice, nor consent. It’s directly addressed to leaders of a foreign government presently involved in talks with the U.S., and it is designed to thwart those talks. Unless the senators were authorized by the president to address Iran’s leaders in this letter, a case can be made that 47 U.S. senators just violated a federal law that carries a prison term of up to three years.

Whether the law was broken or not, the fact remains that once again Republicans have shown themselves not only unfit to govern, but unwilling to govern, because governance sometimes means making agreements that don’t give you everything you want. That the vast majority of GOP senators have so publicly proclaimed their opposition to any deal that could ensure Iran will not pursue nuclear weapons is a travesty of foreign policy, a breach of custom, and possibly a felony.

Once upon a time, not only were Republicans open to nuclear agreements with archenemies, they actually signed them, as Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush did. Reagan’s approach was simple: “Trust, but verify.” Thirty years later, it’s a shame Republicans can’t follow his example.



To: Shoot1st who wrote (14262)3/9/2015 2:26:19 PM
From: joseffy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 16547
 
American Sniper’ Takes 2014 Box Office Crown

..................................................................................................
Breitbart.com ^ | 03/09/2015 | John Nolte




To: Shoot1st who wrote (14262)3/11/2015 10:48:07 AM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
Obama is close to entering into a ten-year agreement with Iran (extending well beyond his term in office), without presenting that agreement for Senate ratification as a treaty.



To: Shoot1st who wrote (14262)3/11/2015 10:48:32 AM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
We’ve seen Obama unilaterally suspending and revising the details of Obamacare, an instance of which is now the most prominent case before the Supreme Court.



To: Shoot1st who wrote (14262)3/11/2015 10:48:56 AM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
How many times did Obama say he’d never issue his executive order on immigration?



To: Shoot1st who wrote (14262)3/12/2015 1:01:12 AM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Woody_Nickels

  Respond to of 16547
 



To: Shoot1st who wrote (14262)3/15/2015 8:20:39 PM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation

Recommended By
MJ

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 16547
 
Secretary of State John Kerry compared himself to Winston Churchill, Abraham Lincoln and other great historical luminaries for having the courage and tenacity to tackle the most heinous enemy plaguing mankind —

‘climate change’.

“My heroes are people who dared to take on great challenges without knowing for certain what the outcome would be,” Kerry said in an address to the Atlantic Council on Thursday.

“Lincoln took risks, Gandhi took risks, Churchill took risks, Dr. King took risks, Mandela took risks, but that doesn’t mean that every risk-taker is a role model.”

He said what? Deluded Kerry compares himself to Churchill AND Lincoln; scorn follows

bizpacreview.com



To: Shoot1st who wrote (14262)3/16/2015 1:40:47 AM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
Another Targeted Shooting--2 LAPD cops injured in shooting; gunmen at large


.....................................................
ABC News ^ | March 14, 2015


According to updates, the officers were shot inside their car,



To: Shoot1st who wrote (14262)3/19/2015 10:01:07 PM
From: joseffy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 16547
 
Student group demands California university rename building after convicted cop killer

............................................................................................................................
Fox News ^ | March 19, 2015 | William La Jeunesse, Lee Ross, Michael Lundin

"We want the renaming for someone -- Assata Shakur -- who we feel like represents us as black students," said Black Student Union spokesman Cori McGowens.



To: Shoot1st who wrote (14262)3/19/2015 10:10:40 PM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
A demonstrator on parole shot two Ferguson police officers.

“Whoever fired those shots shouldn’t detract from the issue,” Obama editorialized.