SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Wharf Rat who wrote (842110)3/11/2015 10:24:05 PM
From: Sdgla  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1576015
 
You talking about the big lie is like Slick Willie talking about the war on women. You've got an entire thread based on the biggest lie of the century rat.




To: Wharf Rat who wrote (842110)3/11/2015 10:37:42 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1576015
 
You don't see the problem with evil Google billionaires controlling access to news and making decisions about what the truth is and isn't?

How would YOU feel if Fox News was the only news you could get?



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (842110)3/12/2015 12:42:23 PM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576015
 
Don't you worry your little Stalinist mind. Freedom won't be surprised in America. Suggest you try Venezuela or No Korea.



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (842110)3/12/2015 12:43:15 PM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576015
 
Oregon prepares nation's first per-mile road tax



Hannah Lutz
Automotive News
March 6, 2015 - 3:33 pm ET -- UPDATED: 3/9/15 10:46 am ET - Corrected
Editor's note: More than 10 states are considering programs to tax drivers by the mile driven. An earlier version of this story misstated the status of those considerations.

Some states, worried that rising numbers of electric and fuel-efficient vehicles will crimp their gas-tax revenues, are looking at alternative ways to fund road upkeep.

In July, Oregon will implement the first such alternative.

Oregon is giving its drivers a choice: pay the gas tax at the pump or pay a flat 1.5 cents per mile driven.

“Fuel efficiency is getting better and better, which is great,” said Michelle Godfrey, an Oregon Department of Transportation spokeswoman. But “when your road maintenance is funded by fuel sales, that spells trouble.”

Oregon’s Department of Transportation has teamed up with road-tolling company Sanef ITS Technologies America Inc., the Long Island, N.Y., unit of a French company, and connected car company Intelligent Mechatronic Systems Inc., of Waterloo, Ontario. As many as 5,000 registered vehicle owners in Oregon will be able to join the program starting July 1.

Legislation setting up the system initially limited participation to 5,000 volunteers “to see how the public would accept the program,” Godfrey said.

Here’s how it works.

Intelligent Mechatronic Systems will provide a device that plugs into a vehicle’s on-board diagnostics port to gather mileage data used to determine the usage charge.

Drivers who participate in the road-usage charge program will still pay the gas tax at the pump. But at the end of each month, Sanef ITS and Intelligent Mechatronic Systems will use mileage and fuel-consumption data to compare the 1.5-cent-per-mile tax owed against what the driver paid in gas taxes at the pump.

The companies will provide the results to the state Department of Transportation, which oversees that tax revenue. Participants will then receive either a rebate, or an invoice for per-mile taxes due.

In 2013, Oregon passed a bill that authorized the Department of Transportation to set up a mileage collection system for volunteer motorists to fund state transportation. Over eight months in 2012 and 2013, Oregon conducted a successful 88-participant pilot of the program, prompting the official July 1 start.

More states?

The road usage program is North America’s first execution of mileage-based charging as an alternate method of generating revenue to pay for highways, a joint statement from the state, Sanef ITS and Intelligent Mechatronic Systems said.

But this type of program could become more widespread.

More than 10 states, including Florida, are in the process of drafting legislation for similar programs or considering trial runs, Ben Miners, vice president of innovation at Intelligent Mechatronic Systems, told Automotive News.

With a growing number of electric and hybrid vehicles on the road, gas tax revenues being collected for road maintenance could fall, Sanef ITS president François Gauthey said in the statement.

“To improve and maintain America’s roadway infrastructure, the transition from a gas tax to a distance-based road usage charge solution is a critical evolution,” he said. “Creating a sustainable but fair system for collecting revenues is essential for future sustainability of critical transportation networks.”

http://www.autonews.com/article/20150306/OEM05/150309871/oregon-prepares-nations-first-per-mile-road-tax



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (842110)3/12/2015 12:52:16 PM
From: Brumar89  Respond to of 1576015
 
.... the Competitive Enterprise Institute has filed a FOIA request with the Environmental Protection Agency asking for correspondence related to climate change from Mr. Grijalva, Arizona Democrat, and three Democratic senators — the same three investigating whether 100 fossil fuel companies and trade associations have funded climate research.

Mr. Grijalva’s probe into academic research funding has been likened to McCarthyism, but Competitive Enterprise Institute senior fellow Christopher Horner said the point of the latest round of requests isn’t that one good witch-hunt deserves another.

Rather, the inquiries are aimed at “reminding those who think it’s a one-way street that, since the congressman seeks only information from people who dare disagree with him, we can do what they do,” said Mr. Horner, who also filed the Grijalva-inspired FOIAs on behalf of the Free Market Environmental Law Clinic and the Energy & Environment Legal Institute.

“You believe information is necessary for the public to properly assess claims, then so do we,” said Mr. Horner. “We are even using laws enacted for the purpose, unlike the gentleman sailing in under the flag of congressional letterhead and whatever that implies, but not even a pretense at citing any authority that I can see.”

...............

Elsewhere, reports are seeping out about funding of climate research by pro-“warmist” nonprofits such as the Park Foundation in Ithaca, New York.

The foundation began funding Cornell marine biologist Robert Howarth after approaching him in 2010 to write an “academic article that would make a case that shale gas was a dangerous, polluting fuel,” according to a Summer 2014 article in Philanthropy magazine.

“By simultaneously funding an interlocking triangle of sympathetic scientists, anti-fracking nonprofits, and media outlets, Park helped move the idea that natural gas is environmentally unfriendly from the activist fringe to the mainstream,” said the article by Jon Entine, senior research fellow at the Center for Health & Risk Communication at George Mason University. “The foundation has continued to provide numerous grants (in the range of $50,000 to $60,000) directly to Howarth and his research colleagues.”

Mr. Howarth said his research is not motivated by financial considerations. The report also points to Ithaca College biologist Sandra Steingraber, a recipient of Park Foundation funding who was active in the anti-fracking fight in New York as a co-founder of New Yorkers Against Fracking — which also has received Park funding, according to the pro-industry website Energy in Depth.

In addition, Ms. Steingraber was a peer reviewer on a research paper cited by the Cuomo administration in New York when enacting its statewide fracking ban last year, although she told a reporter afterward that she was “absolutely objective about the data.”

The largest source of research dollars, of course, is the federal government, which spent $32.5 billion on climate research from 1989 to 2009, according to the Science and Public Policy Institute.

The White House has placed itself firmly the “warmist” camp with President Obama’s Climate Action Plan and declarations on the website such as “Due to climate change, the weather is getting more extreme.”

“Billions of dollars have been poured into studies supporting climate alarm, and trillions of dollars have been involved in overthrowing the energy economy,” Richard Lindzen, a retired professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and one of the “Grijalva Seven,” said in a March 4 op-ed in The Wall Street Journal. “So it is unsurprising that great efforts have been made to ramp up hysteria, even as the case for climate alarm is disintegrating.”

Still, it’s tough to prove that a federal grant into climate research, even one from the Obama administration, is somehow evidence of bias, and Mr. Horner isn’t trying.

Instead, the Competitive Enterprise Institute’s FOIA requests ask the EPA for any communications between Democratic Sens. Barbara Boxer of California, Edward J. Markey of Massachusetts and Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island and four staffers in the EPA’s office of congressional and governmental relations.

Specifically, the FOIAs seek communications dating from Jan. 1, 2013, that mention Tom Steyer, founder of the left-wing advocacy group NextGen Climate, as well as the terms “denier,” “denial” and “deniers,” and liberal groups including the Climate Investigations Center, Greenpeace, the Energy Foundation, the Center for American Progress and the Sierra Club.

Mr. Horner’s FOIAs asking for funding information on four climate professors were sent to the University of Arizona, the University of Colorado, the University of Delaware and the Georgia Institute of Technology.

Mr. Grijalva sent letters to three of those universities, as well as Arizona State University, Pepperdine University, MIT and the University of Alabama, focusing on professors who had testified to Congress about climate issues.

Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/mar/11/climate-change-denier-scientist-funding-investigat/#ixzz3UBKcF66C
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (842110)3/12/2015 2:25:40 PM
From: Brumar893 Recommendations

Recommended By
FJB
PKRBKR
TideGlider

  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1576015
 
Fifteen Years Since Global Warming Destroyed The Planet

Posted on March 12, 2015 by stevengoddard



Mercury News: Search Results



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (842110)3/12/2015 3:13:59 PM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576015
 
Before They Could Make The Hockey Stick, They Had To Remove The 1940’s Blip

Posted on March 12, 2015 by stevengoddard

Jones 1998 showed that all Northern Hemisphere warming occurred before 1940, and recent temperatures were similar to the MWP.



www.st-andrews.ac.uk/~rjsw/papers/Jonesetal-1998.pdf

The graph below shows just the recent portion.



But Phil has changed all that, and now shows that essentially all warming occurred after 1970.



Wood for Trees: Interactive Graphs

The next graph is an overlay showing the current CRUTEM (red) on top of 1998 Jones.



You can see how Phil removed the 1940’s blip, and created a hockey stick after 1970. Then he deleted all his E-mails related to this.

From: Tom Wigley <wigley@ucar.edu>
To: Phil Jones <p.jones@uea.ac.uk>

Subject: 1940s
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 23:25:38 -0600
Cc: Ben Santer <santer1@llnl.gov>

It would be good to remove at least part of the 1940s blip, but we are still left with “why the blip”.

di2.nu/foia/1254108338.txt

Mike,
Can you delete any emails you may have had with Keith re AR4? Keith will do likewise… Can you also email Gene [Wahl] and get him to do the same? I don’t have his new email address. We will be getting Caspar [Ammann] to do likewise.

Cheers, Phil

junksciencearchive.com/FOIA/mail/1212063122.txt