SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : S3 (A LONGER TERM PERSPECTIVE) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ken Muller who wrote (8464)12/18/1997 2:38:00 PM
From: Michael  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 14577
 
Ken, look through company news- this type of thing happens all the time.



To: Ken Muller who wrote (8464)12/18/1997 3:59:00 PM
From: Cosmo Kramer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 14577
 
Thursday December 18, 9:16 am Eastern Time

Company Press Release

Class Action Announcement

LOS ANGELES--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Dec. 18, 1997--A class action has been commenced in the Superior Court of the State of
California, County of Santa Clara on behalf of purchasers of S3 Inc. (Nasdaq:SIII - news; ''S3'') common stock during the period
Oct. 16, 1996 to Nov. 3, 1997 (the ''Class Period'').

The complaint charges S3 and various officers and directors with violations of certain California Corporations Code statutes.
During the Class Period, the complaint alleges that S3 and its senior-most officers and directors issued materially false financial
statements and a series of materially false and misleading statements about S3's operations, customers and future prospects. The
complaint alleges the defendants concealed that S3 had improperly recognized sales to international distributors. The complaint
further alleges that on Nov. 3, 1997, S3 announced that as the result of its improper accounting revenue recognition, it expected to
restate its revenue downward for ''prior quarters'' by a total of between $40 and $70 million and that its resulting net income for
those quarters would be reduced by 14 cents to 29 cents per share.

The materially false and misleading public statements the defendants disseminated throughout the Class Period acted to inflate the
market price of S3's stock, driving it to an all-time high of over $23 per share by October of 1996. The complaint alleges that
defendants made and caused these materially false and misleading statements to be made in order to artificially inflate S3's stock
price so that company insiders could sell off more than 400,000 of their shares at artificially inflated prices for gross proceeds in
excess of $7.4 million.

Plaintiffs seek to recover damages on behalf of all purchasers of S3 common stock during the Class Period. They are represented
by several law firms, including Stull Stull & Brody, Weiss & Yourman and Morris and Morris, who have expertise in prosecuting
investor class actions and extensive experience in actions involving financial fraud.

If you wish to discuss this action or have questions concerning this notice or your rights or interests, please contact plaintiffs'
counsel, David Katz at Weiss & Yourman by calling toll-free 1-888/593-4771 or by e-mail at wynyc@aol.com; or Michael D.
Braun at Stull, Stull & Brody by calling toll-free 1-888/388-4605, or by e-mail at braunatssb@aol.com, or Patrick F. Morris at
Morris and Morris by calling toll-free 1-800-296-0410 or by e-mail at morrisandmorris@compuserve.com.

Contact:

Weiss & Yourman, New York
David Katz, Esq., 888-593-4771
or
Stull, Stull & Brody, Los Angeles
Michael Braun, Esq., 888-388-4605
or
Morris and Morris, Wilmington, Del.
Patrick F. Morris, Esq., 800-296-0410

More Quotes and News:
S3 Inc (Nasdaq:SIII - news)
Related News Categories: computers, semiconductors



To: Ken Muller who wrote (8464)12/18/1997 4:11:00 PM
From: steven flig  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 14577
 
The law requires you to prove fraud not that they just made mistakes.Why file state court actions unless you believe your federal claims will be dismissed.There is no way both actions will proceed to trial in 2 separate forums unless plaintiff's believe their fed claims will be dismissed.This state action is a classic CYA.