SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tejek who wrote (843050)3/16/2015 12:11:47 AM
From: i-node3 Recommendations

Recommended By
D.Austin
FJB
TideGlider

  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 1573925
 
Obamacare killing hospitals.

We lost one in West Memphis, AR last year. My friend, from West Memphis, who was waiting on a heart transplant tragically died in a Memphis hospital in January. While having the West Memphis hospital might not have saved his life, we'll never know.

These are the dead and injured you never hear about. Mt. Vernon's closest hospitals, I suspect, are Mt. Pleasant and Greenville, an hour either direction.

=================
Rural hospitals, beset by financial problems, struggle to survive



By Guy Gugliotta March 15 at 5:21 PM
MOUNT VERNON, Tex. — Despite residents’ concerns and a continuing need for services, the 25-bed hospital that served this small East Texas town for more than 25 years closed its doors at the end of 2014, joining the ranks of dozens of other small rural hospitals that have been unable to weather the punishment of a changing national health-care environment.

For the high percentages of elderly and uninsured patients who live in rural areas, closures mean longer trips for treatment and uncertainty during times of crisis. “I came to the emergency room when I had panic attacks,” said George Taylor, 60, a retired federal government employee. “It was very soothing and the staff was great. I can’t imagine Mount Vernon without a hospital.”

The Kansas-based National Rural Health Association, which represents about 2,000 small hospitals across the country and other rural care providers, says that 48 rural hospitals have closed since 2010, the majority in Southern states, and 283 others are in trouble. In Texas alone, 10 have closed.

“If there was one particular policy causing the trouble, it would be easy to understand,” said Mark Holmes, a health economist at the University of North Carolina. “But there are a lot of things going on.”

Experts and practitioners cite declining federal reimbursements for hospitals under the Affordable Care Act as the principal reasons for the recent closures. Besides cutting back on Medicare, the law reduced payments to hospitals for the uninsured, a decision based on the assumption that states would expand their Medicaid programs. However, almost two dozen states have refused to do so. In addition, additional Medicare cuts caused by a budget disagreement in Congress have hurt hospitals’ bottom lines.

But rural hospitals also suffer from multiple endemic disadvantages that drive down profit margins and make it virtually impossible to achieve economies of scale.

These include declining populations; disproportionate numbers of elderly and uninsured patients; the frequent need to pay doctors better than top dollar to get them to work in the hinterlands; the cost of expensive equipment that is necessary but frequently underused; the inability to provide lucrative specialty services and treatments; and an emphasis on emergency and urgent care, chronic money-losers.

Rural health-care experts say that unless the problems of rural hospitals are addressed by state and federal officials, there could be a repeat of the widespread closings that followed an overhaul of the Medicare payment system 30 years ago. That 1983 change, called the prospective payment system, established fixed reimbursements for care instead of payments based on a hospital’s reported costs. It rewarded large, efficient providers, but 440 small hospitals closed before the system was adjusted in 1997 to help them. Those adjustments created the designation of critical-access hospitals for some small, isolated facilities, and exempted them from the fixed-payment system.

“And now, beginning in 2010, we’ve had another series of cuts that are all combining to create another expansion of closures just like we saw in the ’90s,” said Brock Slabach, senior vice president of the Rural Health Association. “We don’t want to wake up with another disaster.”

In Mount Vernon, a town of 2,678 people nestled in grassland and dairy country about two hours east of Dallas, family practitioner Jean Latortue has taken out a lease on the now-vacant hospital building to convert it into an outpatient and urgent care clinic at his own expense. Reopening may be a risky move, he acknowledged, but the need is there.

“The community went into panic mode,” he said. “I figured I had to step up.”

The nonprofit ETMC Regional Healthcare System, based in Tyler, Tex., closed the Mount Vernon hospital and two others of its then-12 rural hospital affiliates because it could no longer sustain operating losses that had persisted for five years.

Perry Henderson, senior vice president of affiliate hospitals for ETMC, and other experts cite three reasons for the rash of closures nationally.

Sequestration, the across-the-board federal budget cut that arose out of the legislative impasse between the Obama administration and congressional Republicans, has resulted in a 2 percent reduction in Medicare reimbursements since 2013.

“If Medicare is 50 percent of your revenue and you lose two points,” North Carolina’s Holmes said, “it can be a killer.”

Rural hospitals took a second hit from the health law’s reductions in special Medicaid payments to hospitals with large numbers of indigent and uninsured patients. Federal officials made the cuts assuming that most states would embrace the Medicaid expansion envisioned in the law, thus sharply reducing their number of uninsured. But 23 states, including Texas, have declined to do so.

Another issue is the deductibles charged by some of the new insurance plans created under the health law. In many cases, they “are running between $2,500 and $5,000,” and people can’t pay them, said Maggie Elehwany, chief lobbyist for the Rural Health Association.

Latortue, who came to Mount Vernon as an ETMC hospital doctor in 2008, appears undaunted by the challenges of reinventing the hospital, which was treating an average of eight inpatients a week when it closed. Still, he said, “I’m very busy, and patients need to be seen — we’ll be all right.”

At the new clinic, he intends to provide outpatient services, including lab work, and emergency care, stabilizing patients until they can be transferred to the Titus Regional Medical Center in Mount Pleasant, 16 miles away, or to a smaller facility in Winfield, eight miles away. He also plans a wellness clinic to treat obesity and will offer Botox and laser cosmetic services. A cardiologist and a gastroenterologist will make weekly visits, and he is also looking for an Ob-Gyn.

Still, none of this will replace the hospital, and his patients know it. “I live right behind the building,” said Mary Hunter, a fit grandmother of 73. “I’ve had very good health until my blood pressure spiked last week,” she said. “We retired in 2006 and moved here, partly because of the hospital. And now it’s gone.”



This article was produced through a collaboration between The Washington Post and Kaiser Health News, an editorially independent news service that is a program of the Kaiser Family Foundation.











To: tejek who wrote (843050)3/16/2015 11:32:04 AM
From: i-node2 Recommendations

Recommended By
Tenchusatsu
TideGlider

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1573925
 
shiftwa.org

Seattle’s $15 minimum wage law goes into effect on April 1, 2015. As that date approaches, restaurants across the city are making the financial decision to close shop. The Washington Policy Center writes that “closings have occurred across the city, from Grub in the upscale Queen Anne Hill neighborhood, to Little Uncle in gritty Pioneer Square, to the Boat Street Cafe on Western Avenue near the waterfront.”

Of course, restaurants close for a variety of reasons. But, according to Seattle Magazine, the “impending minimum wage hike to $15 per hour” is playing a “major factor.” That’s not surprising, considering “about 36% of restaurant earnings go to paying labor costs.” Seattle Magazine,

“Washington Restaurant Association’s Anthony Anton puts it this way: “It’s not a political problem; it’s a math problem.”

“He estimates that a common budget breakdown among sustaining Seattle restaurants so far has been the following: 36 percent of funds are devoted to labor, 30 percent to food costs and 30 percent go to everything else (all other operational costs). The remaining 4 percent has been the profit margin, and as a result, in a $700,000 restaurant, he estimates that the average restauranteur in Seattle has been making $28,000 a year.

“With the minimum wage spike, however, he says that if restaurant owners made no changes, the labor cost in quick service restaurants would rise to 42 percent and in full service restaurants to 47 percent.”

Restaurant owners, expecting to operate on thinner margins, have tried to adapt in several ways including “ higher menu prices, cheaper, lower-quality ingredients, reduced opening times, and cutting work hours and firing workers,” according to The Seattle Times and Seattle Eater magazine. As the Washington Policy Center points out, when these strategies are not enough, businesses close, “workers lose their jobs and the neighborhood loses a prized amenity.”

A spokesman for the Washington Restaurant Association told the Washington Policy Center, “Every [restaurant] operator I’m talking to is in panic mode, trying to figure out what the new world will look like… Seattle is the first city in this thing and everyone’s watching, asking how is this going to change?” The Washington Policy Center,

“Seattle is rightly famous for great neighborhood restaurants. That won’t change. What will change is that fewer people will be able to afford to dine out, and as a result there will be fewer great restaurants to enjoy. People probably won’t notice when some restaurant workers lose their jobs, but as prices rise and some neighborhood businesses close, the quality of life in urban Seattle will become a little bit poorer.”



To: tejek who wrote (843050)3/16/2015 4:37:40 PM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 1573925
 
Ferguson home values are plummeting, and residents are feeling the pain

..........................................................................
Fusion ^ | March 16, 2015 | Daniel Rivero




To: tejek who wrote (843050)3/16/2015 4:46:30 PM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation

Recommended By
FJB

  Respond to of 1573925
 
The Logan Act Is Not a Friend to Liberalism

...........................................................................................
National Review ^ | 3/13/2015 | CHARLES C. W. COOKE





To: tejek who wrote (843050)3/16/2015 5:01:30 PM
From: joseffy2 Recommendations

Recommended By
FJB
locogringo

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573925
 
It’s Clear Tom Cotton Won His Battle with Obama


.......................................................................
breitbart.com ^ | 3/15/15 | William Bigelow

Even Politico, a reliably leftist media outlet that has done its best to support Barack Obama from pillar to post, is now tacitly acknowledging that hard-line Senator Tom Cotton has won his battle with the administration over the letter he authored to Iran that was signed by 46 other GOP senators. Key to understanding Cotton’s victory are two developments: the White House doing its damndest to vilify him on the Sunday talks shows, thus acknowledging he had not been defeated, and the refusal of Democrats who had rejected Obama’s focus on diplomacy to abandon their position despite the White House attempting to use Cotton’s letter to persuade them to do so.

Establishment GOP members who denigrated Cotton’s effort and refused to sign it, like Sen. Jeff Flake of Arizona and Sen. Susan Collins of Maine, joined by Michael Gerson, former speechwriter for George W. Bush, were left behind as not one whit of support for sanctions melted away.

Secretary of State John Kerry, trotted out on Sunday to appear on CBS’s Face the Nation, was asked if he would apologize to Iran for Cotton’s letter. Kerry, the erstwhile critic of American forces, pathological liar, and long-time hater of America, blustered of the former Army captain and Bronze Star recipient, “Not on your life, I’m not going to apologize for an unconstitutional and un-thought-out action by somebody who’s been in the United States Senate for sixty-some days.”

Politico tries hard t
o make it seem like Cotton’s efforts had failed by making a bipartisan issue into a partisan one, quoting Sen. Gary Peters (D-MI) saying, “The letter was simply unacceptable, and it brought hyperpartisanship to an issue that we need to maintain our bipartisanship in”; echoed by Senator Heidi Heitkamp (D-ND), who asserted “The letter’s incredibly unfortunate and inappropriate”; and Sen. Bill Nelson (D-FL) adding, “This is a sad day in America when people are trying to kill negotiations that are underway.”

But Peters concluded by saying of Senate Foreign Relations Chairman Bob Corker’s bill, which would give Congress 60 days to reject or approve of any deal, “That doesn’t change my support for that bill. … I stay firm.” Heitkamp said of Cotton’s letter, “That doesn’t diminish my support for the legislation that we introduced.” When Nelson was asked if he would abandon support for Corker’s bill, “No. I’m an original co-sponsor.” Sen. Michael Bennet of (D-CO) co-sponsored Corker’s bill the day after Cotton’s letter created an uproar; he became the 11th Democrat to line up behind Corker.

White House chief of staff Denis McDonough, desperately trying to win any victory at all for his boss, wrote a letter to Corker, released on Saturday, begging him to postpone a vote on his bill. He said the bill “goes well beyond ensuring that Congress has a role to play in any deal with Iran.” McDonough added that negotiations could continue until June, but Cotton had no interest in placating the White House. Cotton had bluntly stated on Thursday, “Let a couple days go by. We think there’s going to be really ignited momentum. Nobody’s dropping out. We’ve had reaffirmed commitment” from Democrats.

In the Senate, virtually all of the 54 Republicans have joined with over a dozen Democrats in the Senate to champion increased sanctions against Iran
; in the House, hearings will be held this week to ferret out information from administration officials on Iran. In 2013, the House voted 400-20 for harsh sanctions against Iran.

GOP insiders state that several Democrats told then privately that they still supported sanctions despite Cotton’s letter. Corker’s bill, which would give Congress the power to invalidate any deal Obama makes with Iran, is likely to come before the floor in April.

Sen. Mark Kirk (R-IL) has offered another bill that would implement sanctions if Iran abandons talks or reneges on a deal. Kirk alleged that 68 senators have already said they would back his bill, and he said his support would increase “once we actually vote.”



To: tejek who wrote (843050)3/16/2015 5:12:06 PM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation

Recommended By
FJB

  Respond to of 1573925
 
Gulf Arabs respond with alarm to Kerry comment on Assad talks

..........................................................
REUTERS ^ | Mar 16, 2015





To: tejek who wrote (843050)3/16/2015 5:13:38 PM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 1573925
 
Professor: You Still Have "White Privilege" Even if you "Survived a Nazi Concentration Camp"

................................................................
Pundit Press ^ | 3/16/15 | Aurelius





To: tejek who wrote (843050)3/16/2015 5:25:34 PM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation

Recommended By
FJB

  Respond to of 1573925
 
Is John Kerry a Moron?