SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Techniclone (TCLN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: EZLibra who wrote (898)12/18/1997 4:05:00 PM
From: john dixon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3702
 
Another down day for TCLN on the market. So what do I do, I bought more stock today. I must be a glutton for punishment. Remember boys, the sun don't shine on one dogs a__ all the time. We will have our day. Please, don't ask when.



To: EZLibra who wrote (898)12/18/1997 6:55:00 PM
From: shero  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3702
 
This is the first post that may shed light on this very puzzling enigma, but first to Lippmans' quote. I think it is a reference to VE. Remember less drug but with more delivered to the sight.

I think with this post you are going to become in Tustin the persona non grata I've been for years, and it may explain alot. My problem has been in figuring out why Stone and Co. have been acting irrationally. Their only hope for a good life is if the company succeeds and the stock goes up--but at the same time they are destroying any hope for the future. They seem to be trying to make this company so unattractive that no one will come on board. Why? It doesn't seem logical on the surface.

But if they are afraid that certain things they may have done aren't "kosher" and they will be discovered by a new CEO than why not take the company down with them. If they have to disgorge their stock or options then you are talking about very serious stuff. Nothing at all like what I have been complaining about but major felony stuff.

Of course I don't believe that any of this speculation is the case but it is certainly more interesting than what the "burn rate" consists of. And that would explain this very illogical action by Stone and Co.

Davis, you didn't make any friends at the company today--and the friends we both have might not have jobs in 60 days anyway.

Even though I've been very negative about the scumbag sleazoids running the company I have very high hopes the technology will reach the market and this investment is going to be a grand slam homerun. Or as Peter Lynch says "a 10 bagger".