Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (843546)	3/18/2015 7:55:57 PM
From: bentway	Respond to of 1577987

That was a Harvard study which has been discredited. According to YOUR asstalk and extreme right wing 'sources'. So, NOT!

To: i-node who wrote (843546)	3/19/2015 9:27:03 AM
From: Alighieri	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1577987

While it am be reasonable to blame some deaths on not having insurance, every competent study has found the numbers to be far smaller. How much smaller? Smaller than the people who died during the one time event of 9/11? How many deaths is acceptable to save the money we will spend on ACA while in your mind(?) it was justifiable, indeed wise, to spend billions (leading to trillions as the consequences unfold) to invade iraq? How much smaller is the number of people who die EVERY YEAR for lack of health insurance? What is acceptable? Al