SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : How Quickly Can Obama Totally Destroy the US? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Shoot1st who wrote (14537)3/20/2015 2:06:04 PM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Blasher

  Respond to of 16547
 
Obama's Arab Spring is approaching 300,000 dead in Syria alone. It turned Libya into a terror state with no government. Islamic State controls an area larger than the UK in Syria and Iraq.



To: Shoot1st who wrote (14537)3/20/2015 2:07:29 PM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
ISIS STRIKES AGAIN: 137 killed, 345 injured in suicide attacks on Yemen mosques...



To: Shoot1st who wrote (14537)3/22/2015 9:04:10 AM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
US evacuates staff as Yemen on edge of civil war Great work, Obama
...............................................................
AFP ^ | 3/22/2015 | Fawaz al-Haidari




To: Shoot1st who wrote (14537)3/22/2015 9:05:42 AM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation

Recommended By
John

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 16547
 
Feminist Reporter: Take Away White Men’s Guns

.........................................................................
Daily Caller ^ | 3/22/15 | Patrick Howley



To: Shoot1st who wrote (14537)3/22/2015 9:06:43 AM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
Cotton's Iran Letter Turns Tables on Obama

..................................................................................................
.
Real Clear Politics ^ | March 22, 2015 | By Salena Zito




To: Shoot1st who wrote (14537)3/22/2015 8:42:35 PM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
POLICE DEPTS HIRING 'WORK PERMIT' IMMIGRANTS AS OFFICERS...

'Handing over gun and badge to somebody whose background we don't know'...


Small-town America 'struggling to cope' with wave of new migrants...

Shelters prepare for new surge...

Illegals skipping deportation hearings spikes 153%...



To: Shoot1st who wrote (14537)3/23/2015 12:57:45 AM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
East Georgia Mayor Attempting To Abuse Her Authority, Caught On Bodycam

VIDEO is Hilarious

liveleak.com



Gordon, GA – A citizens group in an East Georgia town that wants the removal of their mayor has posted a video showing a confrontation between the mayor and a police officer making a DUI arrest.

The group “Concerned Citizens of Gordon, Ga.” posted the video on their Facebook page, showing the exchange between Gordon Mayor Mary Ann Whipple-Lue and the officer.

The group says they obtained the video recorded on Monday night, March 16, by a body camera on the officer through an Open Records request.

The arrest took place in front of the mayor’s property.

After the officer had questioned and handcuffed the suspect, you hear Mayor Whipple-Lue walking up and asking the officer what’s going on. She then tells the officer that she needs the vehicles moved out of the way now.

After the officer asked the mayor to step back, she said, “I need it (the vehicles) moved out of the way right now” and added “I should not be blocked in.”

After the officer said he was in the middle of making an arrest, Mayor Whipple-Lue said “If you can’t move it, I can move it.”

When the officer told her that neither she nor the suspect could move the cars and she needed to step back, you can see the mayor on camera saying “You’re defying me. Now, I’m the mayor so get this car out of the way so I can get out of the way.”

As the confrontation intensifies, the mayor asks the officer, “Are you going to arrest me?” He said, “I will arrest you for obstruction.” She replied, “You will not arrest me” but the officer answered, “Yes, ma’am, I will arrest you.”

After the two minute exchange, the officer asks her to please go back to her vehicle. She replies, “You’ve got some nerve.”

The citizens group has battled with the mayor for several months, trying to have her removed from office because she allegedly has abused her powers.


Read more at liveleak.com



To: Shoot1st who wrote (14537)3/25/2015 11:29:20 AM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
Nebraska senator compares police to ISIS, suggests he’d shoot a cop

...............................................................................
www.foxnews.com ^ | 3/25/15 | Deena Winter


March 4, 2015: Nebraska State Sen. Ernie Chambers speaks at a hearing before the Judiciary Committee in Lincoln, Neb. (AP)



A Nebraska state senator compared American police to Islamic terrorists and suggested he'd shoot a cop if only he had a weapon.

State Sen. Ernie Chambers said during a legislative hearing on March 20 that you don't have to go halfway around the world to find an ISIS mentality. It can be found in America because police terrorize blacks every day.

He was referring to the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria, which has beheaded journalists and brutally executed Westerners and others.

"My ISIS is the police," Chambers, an independent, said, adding police can get away with shooting people if they "think" they're going to do something -- like pull a weapon.

"The police are licensed to kill us -- children, old people," he said.

Nebraska's longest serving senator, Chambers represents north Omaha, a high-crime area where racial tension simmers and sometimes erupts after encounters with police.

"I wouldn't go to Syria, I wouldn't go to Iraq, I wouldn't go to Afghanistan, I wouldn't go to Yemen, I wouldn't go to Tunisia, I wouldn't go to Lebanon, I wouldn't go to Jordan, I would do it right here," Chambers, who is black, said. "Nobody from ISIS ever terrorized us as a people as the police do us daily."

Chambers then added fuel to the fire, saying if he had a gun, he would use it on police, not his political opponents.

"If I was going to carry a weapon, it wouldn't be against you, it wouldn't be against these people who come here that I might have a dispute with. Mine would be for the police," he said. "And if I carried a gun I'd want to shoot him first and then ask questions later, like they say the cop ought to do."

Click for more from Watchdog.org.



To: Shoot1st who wrote (14537)3/25/2015 11:30:37 AM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
Why Do Islamists Love Bulldozing History So Much?
............................................................................................
National Review ^ | 03/25/2015 | Daniel Pipes


The recent bulldozing by the Islamic State of the ancient cities of Nimrud, Hatra, and Korsabad, three of the world’s greatest archaeological and cultural sites, is just this group’s latest round of assaults across the large area under its control. Since January 2014, the flamboyantly barbaric Islamic State, also known as ISIS, has blown up Shiite mosques, bulldozed churches, pulverized shrines, and plundered museums.

Worse, the ISIS record fits into an old and common pattern of destruction of historical artifacts by Muslims.

Some attacks target the works of other, rival religions, such as Orthodox churches in northern Cyprus (since 1974), the Bamiyan Buddhas in Afghanistan (in 2001), the Ghriba synagogue in Tunisia (2002), a historic Hindu temple in Malaysia (2006), and the Assyrian antiquities (“idols”) in Mosul (2015). On a personal level, a Saudi national smashed historic statues at the Senso-Ji Buddhist temple in Tokyo in 2014.

Nor is this danger over: Islamic leaders have bruited plans to destroy Persepolis in Iran, St. Catherine’s Monastery in the Sinai, and the Great Pyramids of Egypt.

In some cases, conquerors turn non-Islamic holy places into Islamic ones, thereby asserting the supremacy of Islam. This can be done by converting them into Islamic sanctities, such as the Kaaba in Mecca, the Cathedral of St. John in Damascus, and the Hagia Sophia in Constantinople, or building on top of them, as with Al-Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem and Babri Masjid in Ayodhya, India.

Muslims of one denomination sometimes destroy the legacy of other Islamic sects. Recent examples include the tomb of Sidi Mahmoudou, a medieval structure in Timbuktu (2012), Sufi tombs in Libya (2012), and the libraries of Mosul (2015). But best known is the Saudi destruction of antiquities in Mecca since the 1990s, applying strict Wahhabi principles of non-intercession; even Mohammed’s tomb in Medina is in jeopardy.

Destruction also accompanies the fighting of war. The Syrian conflict since 2011 has been particularly devastating in this regard, with battles causing severe damage to such grand antiquities as the Citadel of Aleppo, the Umayyad Mosque, and Crac des Chevaliers. Alongside this, smuggling and other profit-making activities to pay for war costs lead to the wholesale theft and trafficking of rare antiquities. UNESCO reports, for example, that the ancient Syrian site of Apamea is “completely destroyed.”

Ancient artifacts might even be demolished because their space is needed for something deemed urgent. The Palestinian Authority threw out precious Temple Mount archeological remains as mere rubble in 2000 to build a mosque. In 2013, Hamas bulldozed part of the 3,000-year-old Anthedon Harbor in Gaza for military purposes and the Turkish authorities damaged the Byzantine-era walls of the Yedikule Gardens to build a decorative pool.

Finally, there are gratuitously self-inflicted cultural wounds. These include the pillaging of Iraqi museums, libraries, and archives (2003), the burning in 2011 of L’Institut d’Égypte and looting of the Egyptian Museum, the 2013 destruction of manuscripts in Timbuktu and the ransacking of the Mallawi Museum in Minya, Egypt, and the 2014 destruction at the Saeh Library in Tripoli, Lebanon, and at the Museum of Islamic Art in Cairo.

Why does Islam inspire its adherents to annihilate their own patrimony? Because humiliation establishes and reinforces one’s superiority. Destruction of infidel remains confirms the superior power of Muslims and, by implication, the truth of Islam. In parallel, eliminating the vestiges of Muslim rivals establishes the superiority of Islamism over other, less assertive interpretations of Islam.

While the seizure and appropriation of other monuments began at the very inception of Islam (e.g., the Kaaba), the destruction that has reached orgiastic heights with ISIS is something new; note that nearly all the examples listed here date from the 21st century. Turned around, those recently destroyed antiquities survived so long because Muslims had left them alone. In this regard, things are far worse these days than ever before — not a surprise, as Islam is in its worst shape ever. All other major religions have moved beyond such crudely violent impulses, whose motive is unacceptable and whose results are tragic.

Is there a Middle Eastern country that exults in its multi-religious heritage, celebrates ancient artifacts on coins and stamps, builds fabulous museums for its antiquities, treats archeology as a national pastime, and studies manuscripts instead of burning them? Well, yes, there is.

It’s called Israel. The rest of the region could learn a thing or two about historical appreciation from the Jewish state.



To: Shoot1st who wrote (14537)3/25/2015 5:28:11 PM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
The next Josh Earnest presser will be a classic:
“The Bergdahl swap? C’mon dude. That was …like…a year ago. Stale news. Let move on!”



To: Shoot1st who wrote (14537)3/25/2015 5:28:50 PM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
Obama is willing to release 5 murdering terrorists for a deserter he calls a hero.

He attacks Israel to help Iran in the nuke deal.

He gave Putin, "flexibility",

but he won't even talk to US citizens in Congress and pretends election results didn't happen.

His legacy is worse than Carter's.



To: Shoot1st who wrote (14537)3/27/2015 1:04:55 PM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
Wis State Trooper killed in shootout with Bank Robbery Suspect Rate Topic:
.......................................................................................
wbay.com

Casper was a 2011 graduate of Kiel High School, where he was a wrestler, soccer player and member of prom court.

He received his badge on December 19, 2014, according to the Wisconsin Department of Transportation website.

The events of Tuesday started with a bank robbery in the Village of Wausaukee.

The robbery happened at the State Bank of Florence in the 200 block of Main Street in Wausaukee at about 2:00 p.m., according to the Marinette County Sheriff’s Office. The sheriff’s office says the suspect robbed the bank after firing a shot.

Police say the suspect stole a bank employee’s vehicle and left the scene.

A short time later, police were called to another scene near the intersection of Highway 180 and Jermac Road. The call reported a man lying on the side of the road. When police arrived, they found the man dead beside a running vehicle. He has not been identified.

Police believe the suspect stole another vehicle, encountered the victim and shot him.

Officers put out the stolen vehicle’s information to other law enforcement agencies.

Trooper Casper spotted the vehicle at about 5:30 in Fond du Lac. The suspect and the trooper exchanged gunfire, according to the Fond du Lac Police chief. Both Trooper Casper and the suspect were killed.

Fond du Lac police reported another bank robbery at about 4:30 p.m. in the 200 block of North Peters Avenue. The suspect was able to get away with an unknown amount of money in that robbery. Nobody was injured.

It is not clear at this time if the two robberies are connected.

A Facebook page has been set up for Trooper Casper. Click here to view that page.

A Blue Light vigil will go through April 1 to honor Trooper Casper. People can turn on a blue light on their porch or in their window.

All to often we only read about officers for the wrong reasons.
This is sad all the way around, 22 maybe 23 years old, he had only become an officer with the State in December. Left behind are a wife and I am guessing a lot of grieving loved ones.
Perhaps the only nice thing is at least he got the son of a b$tch who it looks like also killed an innocent passerby.

:pray:
Just hoping that those he leaves behind can find peace in knowing that this young man died making a difference and his community a better place.




To: Shoot1st who wrote (14537)3/31/2015 9:55:22 AM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
Remember when the Trayvon Martin shooting hit the news? Most people thought a 12 year old kid was attacked by adult who had uttered racial slurs about him and then shot him to death for no good reason. Whatever you may think of the case, there was a court case and we found out that wasn’t what happened. Trayvon Martin was a 17 year old, 6 foot 3 inch football player, Zimmerman didn’t make any racist reference to him, Martin attacked Zimmerman and was physically beating him when he was shot.

If liberals are the good guys, why do they lie about cases like this one?



To: Shoot1st who wrote (14537)3/31/2015 10:33:54 AM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
‘Disarm NYPD’ seeks to strip police of firearms, create ‘no cop zones’

.....................................................................................
Bizpac Review ^ | 3/31/15 | Steve Berman



To: Shoot1st who wrote (14537)4/2/2015 11:02:42 AM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
The Ghastly Shadow of Munich
...............................................................................................
by Victor Davis Hanson | Apr 02, 2015

The Western capitulation to Adolf Hitler in the 1938 Munich Agreement is cited as classic appeasement that destroyed Czechoslovakia, backfired on France and Britain, and led to World War II.

All of that is true.

But there was much more that caused the Munich debacle than simple Western naiveté. The full tragedy of that ill-fated agreement should warn us on the eve of the Obama's administration's gullible agreement with Iran on nuclear proliferation.
" Ayatollah Khamenei said of the obsequious John Kerry, "I'll kick him out of the tent and jump on his stomach in front of the photographers."
Iran is not united. It is a mishmash nation in which over a third of the population is not Persian. Millions of protestors hit the streets in 2009. An Iranian journalist covering the talks defected in Switzerland -- and said that U.S. officials at the talks are there mainly to speak on behalf of Iran.

By reaching an agreement with Iran, John Kerry and Barack Obama hope to salvage some sort of legacy -- in the vain fashion of Chamberlain -- out of a heretofore failed foreign policy.

There are more Munich parallels. The Iranian agreement will force rich Sunni nations to get their own bombs to ensure a nuclear Middle East standoff. A deal with Iran shows callous disagreed for our close ally Israel, which is serially threatened by Iran's mullahs. The United States is distant from Iran. But our allies in the Middle East and Europe are within its missile range.

Supporters of the Obama administration deride skeptics such as Democratic Sen. Robert Menendez and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as if they were doubting old Churchills.

Finally, the Iranians, like Hitler, have only contempt for the administration that has treated them so fawningly. During the negotiations in Switzerland, the Iranians blew up a mock U.S. aircraft carrier. Their supreme leader, Ayatollah Khamenei, did his usual "death to America" shtick before adoring crowds.

Our dishonor in Lausanne, as with Munich, may avoid a confrontation in the present, but our shame will guarantee a war in the near future.

credit D Austin



To: Shoot1st who wrote (14537)4/2/2015 11:12:51 AM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
Mr. Cleanface’s Dirty Laundry: Harry Reid’s Mob Money
.....................................................................................
Original FReeper research | 01/20/2006 | Fedora
Posted on 1/20/2006, 9:09:35 AM by Fedora

“I’ve gotta Cleanface in my pocket,” boasted Kansas City Mafia representative Joe Agosto, unaware the FBI was monitoring his conversation (reproduced loosely in the movie Casino). FBI surveillance of Mafia gambling operations in Las Vegas in the late 1970s picked up Agosto making references to an individual he codenamed “Mr. Cleanface” and “Mr. Gillette”. Agosto’s conversations mentioned Mr. Cleanface was close to Nevada Governor-Elect Robert List. After turning state’s evidence, Agosto claimed that Mr. Cleanface was Harry Reid, then chairman of the Nevada Gaming Commission and sporting a cleanshaven, boyish look. Agosto’s claims were echoed by former Tropicana Hotel part-owner Deil Gustafson, who testified about Reid’s relationship to Tropicana attorney Jay H. Brown.

Agosto’s testimony led to the conviction of several top Midwestern Mafia bosses, but failed to touch Reid. When questioned after Agosto’s surveillance became public knowledge in mid-1979, Reid admitted to being the subject of the “Mr. Cleanface” references, but denied being paid for any favors. The Justice Department investigated whether Mafia funds had been funneled to Reid through Brown and Mafia attorney Oscar Goodman. A five-month investigation cleared Reid, and 25 years later, Reid is attacking political opponents with slogans like “If we can beat mob, we can fight DeLay-style politics”, and claiming in the process that he “kick[ed] the mob out of Las Vegas in the 1970s”.

Did Harry Reid really kick the mob out of Las Vegas in the 1970s, as he claims? Or was he in the Mafia’s pocket, as Joe Agosto claimed? What are the real facts about Reid’s relationship to organized criminal elements in the gambling industry? Is he Mr. Cleanface, or Mr. Dirty Laundry?

Reid has been using the same tactics to project an image of being Mr. Cleanface since the beginning of his political career. He started as a protege of Donal “Mike” O’Callaghan, who served as Governor of Nevada from 1970 to 1978. Reid was elected as O’Callaghan’s Lieutenant Governor in 1970. With support from O’Callaghan, he ran for Senate in 1974 against Republican Paul Laxalt. Reid’s campaign rhetoric accused Laxalt of profiting from association with billionaire Howard Hughes, who had a long relationship with Capone mob representative Johnny Rosselli and had recently secured Rosselli’s assistance in acquiring Las Vegas’ Desert Inn from associates of Cleveland mobster Moe Dalitz in 1967.

Laxalt had indeed taken contributions from Hughes. But what Reid failed to mention was, so had his own former running mate O’Callaghan. And so had Reid himself.

The whole story is worth reading!


freerepublic.com

credit D Austin



To: Shoot1st who wrote (14537)4/6/2015 7:18:23 PM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
Gov. Sarah Palin: "They Called Sen. Cotton A Traitor"

.............................................................................................................
Conservatives4Palin ^ | April 6, 2015 | iizthatiiz

"I want to talk about the mainstream media’s definition of a traitor.""You can always tell when a liberal is losing his argument. They change the subject."

"Recently, it seemed like the mainstream media has lost it’s mind over Senator Tom Cotton’s open letter to Iran informing it of the realities of our constitutional system."





"The president may negotiate deals, but Congress has to approve deals for them to have lasting effect. And if Congress doesn’t approve this nuclear deal, Congress won’t accept this deal, now or in the future." – Sen Tom Cotton





"Our president cannot unilaterally enter into binding treaties without the Senate’s consent."

"If President Obama tries to use his pen and his phone to make an agreement with Iran, well our next president can simply change his mind"

"Now for speaking the simple truth, the left went ballistic."





"They called Senator Cotton a traitor!"

"They’re claiming that the mere act of posting an open letter on a website, that it’s somehow illegally interferring with diplomatic negotiations."





"Senator Cotton has served this nation in combat."

"He’s risked his life for our liberty."

"But the left wants to change the subject and do anything to avoid the simple truth."





"The President of the United States is trying to go around the Senate to make a deal with one of the most murderous and violent regimes on earth."

"Senator Tom Cotton is trying to do something about it."




To: Shoot1st who wrote (14537)4/9/2015 2:20:30 PM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
Was Obama Fixer Ben Rhodes behind Obama's 'Fact-Sheet' on the Iran?

................................................................................................................................
americanthinker.comby Ed Lasky April 9, 2015



Wherever Ben Rhodes goes, lies follow.

Obama’s foreign policy is cooked up by a very small group of people, among them Ben Rhodes, his deputy national security adviser. This should trouble Americans. I have been writing about Rhodes for years. He has a pattern of twisting the truth to serve his masters. All of 37 years old and untrained in diplomacy, he pontificates omnisciently on Obama’s mastery of world politics.

He was the drafter of the Baker-Hamilton Iraq Study Group. This report
was criticized for deviating from its main goal to analyze the Iraq War under George W. Bush. Instead, it advised outreach to Iran and distancing from Israel. Some of the witnesses called were suspect because of their lack of expertise as well as their biases. Other witnesses were shocked by the report upon its publication because they said it did not reflect their testimony, and in fact distorted what they had conveyed. In other words, their testimony was fictionalized. Who was the principal drafter of that report? Ben Rhodes.

Later, Rhodes became an Obama speechwriter. He wrote, for example, Obama’s Cairo speech, widely criticized for mistakes.

Rhodes has been promoted by Obama to be a key player, Deputy National Security Adviser, in formulating foreign policy. He was, for example, instrumental in Obama’s historic policy concessions to the Castro regime in Cuba. He was out front criticizing Israel’s military actions in Gaza.

Ben Rhodes had no diplomatic, military, intelligence or national security experience and therefore was perfect for the Obama White House. Previous experience is not required to get a job under Barack Obama. His education was in fiction-writing and he washed up in that career and somehow landed in Washington (no doubt helped by the fact that his brother is president of CBS News).

He was widely suspected of being one of the officials involved in whitewashing the Benghazi scandal to protect the White House from blame for that disaster. There is nothing that Barack Obama values more than a willingness to show an elastic definition of truth on behalf of Barack Obama and his reputation.

Every president has had a fixer and Ben Rhodes seems suited for the job. That fiction-writing seems to have helped. Back in 2010, he admitted he always wanted to be a fiction writer and, as Jim Geraghty wrote in the National Review, Barack Obama has given him that chance .

Now Barack Obama has released a “fact-sheet” about what was agreed to with Iran regarding their nuclear program. The version Barack Obama has been peddling to Congress and to America is very sharply at variance with the one the Iranians have been presenting as the “fact-sheet.”

The American version conveys assurances regarding sanctions, inspections, uranium stockpiles, and enrichment capabilities that the White House has been boasting is a “historic” deal, the “best bet” to stop a nuclear Iran, and the only alternative to war.

The Iranians are boasting that none of these assurances are correct, that the White House is engaging in spin and that they “won” in these negotiations. (see Amir Taheri’s “Iran’s Persian statement on ‘deal’ contradicts Obama’s claims.”)

Now even the French are stating that their fact-sheet also differs from the version being broadcast by Obama’s team. And of course their version shows -- as does the Iranian one – that major concessions were made by the White House. These concessions are not what the American people are hearing from the White House, and they will likely lead to the number one terror-supporting nation on Earth (one with much American blood on their hands) in possession of nuclear weapons.

Ben Rhodes and Barack Obama have clearly invested much of their energy and time in achieving what they claim is a historic agreement. As Mathew Continetti wrote in the Washington Free Beacon last year:

Deputy National Security Adviser and MFA in creative writing Ben Rhodes likened an Iranian nuclear deal to Obamacare in a talk to progressive activists last January, according to audio obtained by the Washington Free Beacon.

The remarks, made at a since-discontinued regular meeting of White House personnel and representatives of liberal interest groups, reveal the importance of a rapprochement with Iran to President Obama, who is looking to establish his legacy as his presidency enters its lame-duck phase.

“Bottom line is, this is the best opportunity we’ve had to resolve the Iranian issue diplomatically, certainly since President Obama came to office, and probably since the beginning of the Iraq war,” Rhodes said. “So no small opportunity, it’s a big deal. This is probably the biggest thing President Obama will do in his second term on foreign policy. This is healthcare for us, just to put it in context.”

Rhodes made the comparison as the White House was reeling from the botched rollout of the $2 billion Healthcare.gov. Polls continue to show that the health law, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, remains unpopular.

Rhodes also said the White House wants to avoid congressional scrutiny of any deal.

“We’re already kind of thinking through, how do we structure a deal so we don’t necessarily require legislative action right away,” Rhodes said. “And there are ways to do that.”

That is similar to what an unnamed senior administration official told David Sanger of the New York Times last week for a piece headlined “Obama Sees an Iran Deal That Could Avoid Congress”: “We wouldn’t seek congressional legislation in any comprehensive agreement for years.”

Full Story



To: Shoot1st who wrote (14537)4/15/2015 7:21:47 PM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
Former LA Times Editor New Communications Director for CA Dems
......................................................................................................................

Michael Soller, a former editor on the op-ed pages at the L.A. Times, named communications director for @CA_Dem.

— Christopher Cadelago (@ccadelago) April 14, 2015

Soller has impeccable leftist credentials; in addition to his pontifications for the Times, he has worked for the Service Employees International Union and the American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California, and graduated from UC Berkeley.

Soller, of course, was no fan of George W. Bush; in 2005 he penned a column titled, “We Don’t [Love] Stinkin’ Yankee Running Dog Warmongers”



To: Shoot1st who wrote (14537)4/16/2015 9:39:47 AM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
Remaking Clinton, One Burrito Bowl at a Time
..........................................................................
Tampa Bay Times ^ | 04/16/15 | Daniel Ruth


Message: After nearly 25 years on the national political stage, she has discovered she cares deeply about the much-beleaguered American middle class.

Reaction: Better late than never.

To underscore her bourgeoisie bona fides, the Evita of Chappaqua embarked on a populist road trip from New York to Iowa, even stopping for some fast food at a Chipotle restaurant near Toledo to demonstrate she can rub great unwashed elbows with the best of ambitious politicians. Nothing says "Hail to the Chief" more than a burrito bowl.

Still, Clinton better be careful during this Nighthawks diner phase of the campaign. The patrician John Kerry tried the common man approach in 2004 and came off as the Thurston Howell III of the stump.

So as Clinton noshed her way across the Midwest, we are confronted again with a campaign that could more closely resemble the cranky, know-it-all in-law moving into the house — for the next 18 months.

There were many justifiable knocks on Clinton's 2008 presidential bid, including her not too subtle message that she was entitled to the White House as a matter of Manifest Destiny. She also was ill-served by a hapless, bumbling, feuding campaign staff that made a Three Stooges pie fight look like Bolshoi ballet precision.

This time, instead of coming off as the Lady Macbeth of the Beltway, the strategy appears to be to recast Clinton 2.0 (or is it 8.0?) as a kinder, gentler soul who understands the struggles of average Americans drawn on lessons she's learned after years of collecting $200,000 speaking fees.

The task of transforming Clinton from the cunning Alexis Carrington of Pennsylvania Avenue into the June Cleaver of the nuclear codes has fallen to Kristina Schake, a former image consultant to first lady Michelle Obama.

It was Schake who came up with the idea of sending Obama on a shopping spree to Target and making self-effacing appearances on such shows as Late Night With Jimmy Fallon, where the first lady Mom danced with the host.

Imagine Clinton doing the hokey pokey with David Letterman. On second thought, don't.

You can see the handiwork of Schake at play in Clinton channeling her inner Charles Kuralt by going on the road, engaging small groups of Iowans over coffee and avoiding her traveling press entourage as if they were process servers.

Still, for all the fuzzy-wuzzy optics, a Hillary Clinton is a Hillary Clinton is a Hillary Clinton. This is a woman who has been a ubiquitous presence on the American political scene for decades. And it will be no easy challenge to suddenly convince people Clinton has emerged as a sweetie pie Mary Lou Retton of the electoral college.

But that is not her biggest problem moving forward. Her biggest problem is Kate McKinnon of Saturday Night Live.

McKinnon has crafted a brutally telling caricature of Hillary Clinton lampooning all of the candidate's worst stereotypes as a bloodless, duplicitous, elitist, power-hungry narcissist.

The damning portrayal works so well because it resonates so well.

Political figures can deal with the harsh indictments of the punditocracy. Savvy candidates can fend for themselves in the hardball glare of a debate.

But surviving the problematic tag as a national punch line is far more vexing.

Perhaps the next time Clinton drops in at a Chipotle she should skip the burrito bowl and head straight to the margaritas.



To: Shoot1st who wrote (14537)4/16/2015 10:34:07 PM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Qualified Opinion

  Respond to of 16547
 



To: Shoot1st who wrote (14537)4/20/2015 3:50:08 PM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
Killing Cardillo: What Did The FBI Know And When Did They Know It?
Judicial Watch -- Investigative Bulletin ^ | April 20, 2015 | Micah Morrison
Posted on 4/20/2015, 3:28:19 PM by jazusamo

Yesterday, the New York Post ran my investigative report on a very cold case: the mortal wounding of NYPD Patrolman Phillip Cardillo inside Louis Farrakhan’s Nation of Islam Mosque #7 in Harlem in April, 1972. The “Harlem Mosque Incident” would become one of the most controversial cases in NYPD history—a tale of betrayal and cover-up, race and politics, played out across a disintegrating city.

I’m grateful to the Post for getting behind a story that raises the disturbing possibility that the FBI was deeply involved in the events surrounding Cardillo’s death. Due to space limitations at the newspaper, some of the supporting material had to be cut. Judicial Watch’s Investigative Bulletin is posting the story here in full. If the Post’s terrific version was enough for you, stop here. If you want more—and with apologies for some overlap between the two—read on.

Exactly 43 years ago today—on April 20, 1972—Phillip Cardillo died in St. Luke’s Hospital in New York, six days after being shot inside the mosque. It was a strange and violent time, when New York and the nation found itself at war not just in Vietnam but on its own streets. Racial tensions were running high. Urban homicide rates had skyrocketed. Radical groups like the Weather Underground and the Black Panther Party were trying to stoke a revolutionary fury in the streets with bombings, murder and mayhem. In New York, an ambitious liberal mayor, John Lindsay, was eyeing a run for the presidency.

In a string of brutal crimes directed against the NYPD, officers Thomas Curry and Nicholas Binetti had been blasted with machine-gun fire as they guarded the home of Manhattan DA Frank Hogan. Officers Gregory Foster and Rocco Laurie were murdered on the Lower East Side, shot from behind. Officers Joseph Piagentini and Waverly Jones were shot to death outside a Harlem housing project. Radicals associated with the violent Black Panther Party and Black Liberation Army were fingered for the crimes.

Then came the shooting at Mosque #7. At the time, mosque leader Louis Farrakhan was in the building. Congressman Charles Rangel arrived within an hour. A young police officer named Raymond Kelly—later to become one of New York’s most storied police commissioners—was one of the guards at the hospital where Cardillo died.

Farrakhan, Rangel, Kelly—all would play important roles in the Cardillo case. All have ignored repeated requests by many journalists through the years, including this reporter, to discuss it.

And death was only the beginning of Phil Cardillo’s troubles. The city’s political establishment turned its back on him, a cop killed in the line of duty. The mayor and police commissioner did not attend his funeral, fearing a political backlash in the African-American community and bad press for the Lindsay’s presidential ambitions. The NYPD rank and file was outraged and to this day “Remember Cardillo” is police byword for the perfidy of the political establishment. NYPD brass threw Cardillo under the bus. A special prosecutor later concluded there was an “orchestrated effort” by members of the NYPD “to impede” the Cardillo murder probe.

No one was ever convicted in the killing. “It’s the only homicide of a police officer in New York City in the last 43 years that has not been solved,” says police historian Mike Bosak.

More than four decades later, controversy still shadows the Cardillo case.

In 2006, then-Police Commissioner Ray Kelly ordered a new investigation by the NYPD Major Case Squad. According to 2006 letter from the NYPD to the FBI, the new investigation had been launched “to determine if there is evidence of a conspiracy in 1972” to kill Cardillo. That investigation has dragged on for nine years. Sources tell me there has been no genuine cooperation from the FBI. As late as 2012, a Cardillo cousin circulated a memo saying that the Major Case Squad assured him the investigation was still “active.”

An attempt to name a small street in Harlem after Cardillo hit the rocks in 2013 when the local community board ruled that the police must first get permission from two local mosques—including the one where Cardillo was shot. In an angry letter to Kelly, Cardillo’s son, Todd, called the decision “a slap in the face to me and my family.”

In 2014, media reports said that Cardillo would finally be commemorated with a street named for him outside the new Police Academy and an NYPD patrol boat christened in his honor—but so far, nothing.

For two years, I’ve been digging among the ruins of the Cardillo case. What happened that day at Mosque #7? Why does every attempt to get justice for a slain cop—the initial police investigation, the second police investigation, the secret police investigation, the two trials of an alleged shooter, the grand jury probe by a special prosecutor, the efforts of former detectives and prosecutors—seem to vanish down the memory hole?

Memory, of course, is elusive. Documents less so. The story the documents tell about the Cardillo killing include:

–According to a White House tape, concern about cop killings in New York went all the way to the Oval Office, where President Richard Nixon and FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover launched a secret program to hunt down the murderers.

— A secret NYPD report on the killing, known as the Blue Book, was withheld from the department’s own investigators and from prosecutors in the Manhattan DA’s office.

–A long-forgotten special prosecutor report on the case, buried in state archives for 30 years, raises questions about obstruction of justice.

–FBI documents reveal the existence of high-level Nation of Islam informants and hint at possible dirty tricks at the center of the case.

The ultimate question: can this cold case be solved?

The answers are back in 1972.

Continued



To: Shoot1st who wrote (14537)4/24/2015 11:48:47 AM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
Tom Brady Snubs President Obama as Super Bowl-Winning Patriots Visit White House
.........................................................................................................................
Daily Mail UK ^ 23 April 2015 | By MICHAEL ZENNIE FOR DAILY MAIL ONLINE


The New England Patriots are visiting the White House today to receive congratulations from the president for their Super Bowl XLIX championship.

But the team's victory lap in the nation's capital will come without their biggest star. Quarterback Tom Brady is snubbing President Barack Obama and won't be there. A spokesman for the team cited 'prior family commitments' as the reason Brady, 37, can't go.

The superstar athlete has been to the White House before. He does have three other Super Bowl rings, after all.

But all the prior championships were under the Bush Administration. February's win was the first for the Patriots since Obama took office.

Brady has also met Obama at least once before, as well. He was pictured with the then-US Senator at the 2005 White House Correspondents dinner.

It's not clear what Brady's prior commitment was. His supermodel wife Gisele Bündchen, usually active on social media, gives no hint where the family is today if not in Washington.

Brady led the Patriots to his fourth Super Bowl victory in February after defeating the Seattle Seahawks 28-24. Despite his arm and movement being somewhat diminished by age, Brady's leadership and calm under pressure also won him Super Bowl MVP - his third.

Whatever is taking up Brady's time this week, he made time next week to be ringside at the Floyd Mayweather Jr.-Manny Pacquiao fight in Las Vegas next weekend. According to Sport Illustrated, Brady appealed directly to CBS president Les Moonves for tickets to the much-touted matchup.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...



To: Shoot1st who wrote (14537)4/28/2015 8:17:08 PM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
Thousands of new Lerner emails found

........................................................................
The Hill ^ | April 28, 2015 | Bernie Becker





To: Shoot1st who wrote (14537)4/28/2015 8:20:06 PM
From: joseffy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 16547
 
Freddie Gray had spine surgery before his arrest

...................................................................
fourth estate ^ | 4/28/2015

Freddie Gray had a pre-existing spinal and neck injury and had severe damage and scar tissue from an accident that Allstate Insurance was paying him a large structured settlement.

Freddie had several unsuccessful spinal fusion surgeries, the most recent spinal/cervical operation was a week and a half before he was arrested. Freddie should have been at home in bed resting and recovering from recent major operation instead of manufacturing and distributing drugs on the streets and resisting arrest.

Freddie has a criminal record pages long for manufacturing and distributing controlled dangerous drugs that were cocaine crack heroine etc. along with many assault charges, gun charges, breaking and entering and the list goes on since he was 18 years old (Juvenile records are sealed.)

Look at some of this on www.mdjudiciarycasesearch. You will also see where he was trying to cash in his monthly structured settlement for his spinal injury payments to one lump sum through Peachtree Funding, He could have fallen in the wagon from the slippery bench to the floor or twisted his fused spine to reopen his recently fused damaged spine. No police officers that arrested Freddie had a history of police brutality. Freddie was a dangerous career felon with a damaged spine and neck that was supposed to be healing a week and a half after surgery