Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (844220)	3/22/2015 2:33:03 PM
From: longnshort	1 Recommendation Recommended By FJB Respond to of 1575629

having people freeze to death or starve because of rising food prices over a marxist scam makes libs the spawn of the devil

To: tejek who wrote (844220)	3/22/2015 3:06:37 PM
From: i-node	2 Recommendations Recommended By one_less TideGlider Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575629

Once again, I ask the question. If climate change is a fallacy and the weather is not changing, that still doesn't explain why wingers are opposed to stopping what scientists believe is driving climate change; that is reducing the emission of fossil fuels into the atmosphere. After all, a side benefit would be the improved health of people living in cities. That means that reducing fossil fuel emissions is potentially a twofer....... reducing respiratory ailments and improving the health of residents as well as potentially slowing climate change. And yet, R pols sit on their fat, white asses and object to any reduction in emissions. No "winger" I know of is opposed to either reducing CO2 emissions or our reliance on fossil fuels. Do you know of one who is? The opposition is to wasting our kids money. Borrowing money for "Cash for Clunkers" and to pay for a substantial fraction of the cost of certain cars, decommissioning coal plants before the investments in them are recovered, paying more for fuel unnecessarily, and other insanely expensive policies. There IS a downside in wasting money we don't have. By the time these these costs are amortized, the fuel sources are appropriately depleted, and other technologies have evolved in response to market pressures, alternatives will be here. It is the same reason we don't put in trains all over the place like you want to.