SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: locogringo who wrote (844299)3/22/2015 8:07:21 PM
From: Mongo2116  Respond to of 1576807
 



To: locogringo who wrote (844299)3/22/2015 8:11:40 PM
From: Mongo2116  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576807
 
O'Malley blasts GOP's 'strange view' on income inequality (ANOTHER RIPPING FOR THE GOP OUCH!!)

emocrat Martin O'Malley gets fired up over the fact that some GOP presidential contenders are railing against the growing income gap between the rich and the poor.

"How ironic since their choices led to it," he told The Des Moines Register in an interview Saturday. "This is their theory, and we tried it for the better part of these last 30 years: Concentrate wealth at the top, take regulation out of the equation and keep wages low. So for them now to say that they're somehow very appalled and concerned about inequality is ironic, to put it most kindly."

O'Malley, who was governor of Maryland until January, is in Iowa for a two-day swing, testing Democratic caucusgoers' appetite for a challenger to presumptive nominee Hillary Clinton. He booked stops in Davenport on Friday night, and Tipton, Des Moines and Council Bluffs on Saturday.



Democrat Martin O'Malley, former governor of Maryland, talks about the Republican Party's plans for income equality during a sit-down interview with Jennifer Jacobs, chief political reporter with the Des Moines Register. Michael Zamora/The Register


In a 30-minute interview with the Register, one question that elicited a passionate response was about why he thinks the Democratic message is better than the GOP message on income inequality.

"I mean, ask yourself: Why is it that many of those who are running for president in the Republican Party when they were governors fought so hard against any increase in minimum wage?" O'Malley said. "These guys are not on the side of seeing wages go up. In their strange view of how the economy works, they believe the economy works best when you concentrate wealth at the top. All of us are paying for this concentration of wealth, and we're paying for it in lower wages."

O'Malley, 52, who pitches himself as a results-driven progressive, wants to see whether he can build on support for a White House bid during two Iowa trips — this one and another in April. Top Iowa activists said Democrats are hungry for visits, especially as GOP potential candidates blanket the state and draw national headlines and Clinton stays away.

An Iowa Poll in late January showed that O'Malley has just a tiny seed of support here among likely Democratic caucusgoers. He ranks dead last in a Democratic field of six potential contenders, the Des Moines Register/Bloomberg Politics poll found.



Democrat Martin O'Malley, former governor of Maryland, discusses what his family thinks about a potential presidential run during a sit-down interview with Jennifer Jacobs, chief political reporter with the Des Moines Register.


Although O'Malley remains relatively unknown to rank-and-file Democrats, he cached a reservoir of good will with Iowa's most hard-core activists by doing two dozen events here last year, campaigning and fundraising for state and federal candidates during the midterm elections. His PAC gave $46,000 to Iowa candidates and two party organizations, the Pottawattamie County Democrats and the Iowa Democratic Party, PAC records show.

Those who back O'Malley, who in his spare time is also the lead singer/guitarist in a Baltimore-based Irish folk-rock band, say there's nowhere to go but up in Iowa.

Saturday night in Council Bluffs, O'Malley climbed up on a chair for "a little more elevation so I can make eye contact with those of you in the back."

He told the audience of about 70 at a Pottawattamie County Democrats' event that the party had a very disappointing midterm election, "but it's not how low you go it's how high you bounce, and we are going to bounce back."

He ripped tea party Republicans, saying: "They belittle science. They create traffic jams. Give them a few more weeks and they'll deny Copernicus."

The main theme of his speech was that it's time to stand up to powerful special interests "who think they can gamble with our money and with the economy." Nearly shouting into his microphone, he said: "We have to, as Democrats, step up and regulate Wall Street and make sure that they are never able to create that kind of economic devastation again. That's our job."



Democrat Martin O'Malley, former governor of Maryland, talks about the need for immigration reform during a sit-down interview with Jennifer Jacobs, chief political reporter with the Des Moines Register. Michael Zamora/The Register


O'Malley said that under his leadership, Maryland increased the minimum wage, made it easier for unions to organize and practiced "the economics of inclusion."

After his 20-minute speech, O'Malley grabbed the acoustic guitar that belonged to the Flatwater Drifters, an old-time string band that was playing that night at Dixie Quicks, and told the audience he wanted them to sing along. "It's going to sound like the Mormon Tabernacle Choir!" And the crowd gamely played along, laughing, as he sang a sanitized version of "Scare Away the Dark" by Passenger.

Iowa Senate Majority Leader Michael Gronstal was there wearing a "Martin O'Malley" T-shirt.

"It doesn't necessarily mean that I've endorsed anybody," Gronstal told the crowd. "I welcome any candidate that will come to Council Bluffs. I will put on their T-shirt."

Gronstal noted that O'Malley as Maryland governor passed marriage equality, started the process of cleaning up Chesapeake Bay and improved access to higher education.

"I think he would be a great president," Gronstal said.



To: locogringo who wrote (844299)3/22/2015 8:30:42 PM
From: Mongo2116  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576807
 
Gov. Jerry Brown smacks Ted Cruz around, speaking of his ignorance and calling him "absolutely unfit" for office.


ANOTHER BEAT DOWN FOR A GOP PIG!


Ted Cruz Has ‘Such A Level Of Ignorance,’ He Is ‘Absolutely Unfit To Be Running For Office’ – VIDEO

California Gov. Jerry Brown (D) told NBC’s Chuck Todd that Sen. Ted Cruz’s views on climate change make him “absolutely unfit to be running” for the office of president.

Discussing California’s dwindling water supply and issues surrounding climate change, Todd played a clip of Republican presidential hopeful Ted Cruz (R-TX) speaking to Seth Meyers:

SETH MEYERS: Because I think the world’s on fire, literally. Hottest year on record — but you’re not there, right?

SEN. TED CRUZ: I just came back from New Hampshire where there’s snow and ice everywhere. And my view actually is simple. Debates on this should follow science and should follow data. And many of the alarmists on global warming, they’ve got a problem because the science doesn’t back them up.

Todd followed up by asking Gov. Brown: “What do you say, because you’ve dealt with some Republican skeptics in California on this.”

Gov. Brown responded:

I say what he said is absolutely false. Over 90% of the scientists who deal with climate are absolutely convinced that the human activity, the industrial activity, the generation of CO2, methane, oxides and nitrogen and all the rest of those greenhouse gasses are building up in the atmosphere, they’re heat-trapping, and they’re causing not just warm drought in California, but severe storms and cold in the East Coast.

So it’s climate disruption of many different kinds. And that man betokens such a level of ignorance and a direct falsification of the existing scientific data. It’s shocking and I think that man has rendered himself absolutely unfit to be running for office.

samuel-warde.com



To: locogringo who wrote (844299)3/22/2015 9:29:25 PM
From: joseffy2 Recommendations

Recommended By
FJB
locogringo

  Respond to of 1576807
 
Barry Soetoro’s SECRET SOCIETY, formerly George Soros’ OPEN SOCIETY



canadafreepress.com
By Andrew G. Benjamin March 22, 2015


Open Society Foundations Mission Statement Declassified and Translated into English

The Open Society Foundations work to build vibrant and tolerant democracies IN SECRET whose governments IN SECRET are accountable IN SECRET and open IN SECRET to the participation of all people—except people who are kept out of our SECRETS.

Open Society Command Center, New York City
224 West 57th Street
New York, NY 10019
United States
Phone:+1-212-548-0600
Fax: +1-212-548-4600

The Open Society of which Barack Hussein Obama and Hillary Clinton are a central part agree with the principle of being OPEN by:

1.a. Keeping the contents of negotiations with Iran secret from the Israelis and Americans and by having the current prime minister of Israel defeated secretly with a secret organization organized using American’s taxpayer’s money, the financing of which effort was intended to be kept secret; the secret of which is now being investigated by a congressional committee.

b. After all, Israelis and Americans have no skin in the game and Israel’s interest as the primary target of Iran’s Judeophobia is besides the point. What is not secret of course, to anyone remotely in touch with reality, is the secret plan to reverse history and Israel’s founding and destroy Israel.

2. Keeping the contents of Hillary Clinton’s server which was NOT disclosed to investigators while Clinton was deposed under oath SECRET; and NOT open to the investigators into the Benghazi incident. These secrets are in line with being OPEN in a Society of the secretive Democrat’s re-engineering Society and the Republican’s incompetence managing the investigation.

3. Keeping the contents of the then-pending Obamacare legislation from which Republicans were locked out was in keeping with an OPEN and transparent SECRET government, of the Democrats, by the Democrats, and for the Democrats, for an American Society to be run in SECRET.

In all three examples listed, Americans can agree that:

1. Republicans need have no input into negotiations concerning the global threat from Iran, because ONLY Republicans will die from a Persian nuclear strike; Congress is no longer a branch of the American government - and the United Nations is; the president’s taking the SECRET agreement he is negotiating in behalf of Israel and the world to be ratified by a foreign organization is fine with The People; and the self-same secrets should be withheld from the prime minister of Israel which the later exposed publicly to the president’s chagrin. (After all, Israel is a state that has had no input into it or a need to know.)

There is no issue with taking the agreement of benefit only to Muslims to the Muslim-controlled United Nations, which it now appears is a branch of the US government. It makes sense, because the UN has replaced Congress as the missing branch of the self-same government. The Republican senate has not yet taken note of the changing circumstances, aka “Fundamental Change,” and need to be awakened to the secret so they too can secretly go on vacation.

2. Hillary’s secret server, the existence and contents of which was not disclosed to Congress under sworn testimony, is not the Republican’s business, because Congressional oversight has been expunged from the US Constitution, the Republicans are no longer a political party in need to know, and sworn testimony no longer has perjury provisions as a punishable crime in an age when the meaning of “is” happens to be whatever one wanted to make it.

Full story