To: Wharf Rat who wrote (844320 ) 3/23/2015 9:40:01 AM From: Brumar89 3 RecommendationsRecommended By D.Austin FJB TideGlider
Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1571936 The 4D Nutwork of liberal debate – deride, distract, deny, demonize Posted on March 6, 2015 by dustyk103 [ Example: "What isn't true" - that CO2 is poison that is killing the planet. "What is true" - CO2 is a trace gas essential for life. While it's a greenhouse gas, there's so little it seems to be having little if any impact on the planet, other than spurring plant growth. ] Liberal debate is never to prove the validity of their argument, but to eliminate the opposing argument so the observer doesn’t hear the truth.[ Thus your fascistic calls for skeptics to be jailed for thought crimes. ] Regardless of the subject, when it comes to the opinions of liberals they are always wrong. 21st century liberalism is based on policies that have been proven failures, are detrimental to society, and must be imposed on an unwilling public . Destroying a liberal’s argument in debate is easy if you don’t walk into their trap to make you irrelevant. The 4Ds of liberal debate tactics are all designed to eliminate opposing arguments rather than engage them to prove the validity of their own. Deride – A liberal’s first defense is to express contempt for your opinion through mockery. They believe that if they can make you look like a lair or a fool before the debate begins that they can poison the observer’s mind against you from the start. This begins with the proposition that anything you have to say is irrelevant, incorrect, and devoid of facts. They will say you reject science that proves climate change is real, but make no mention that they believe it is caused by man’s pollution and not by the Sun as that belief in their minds is assumed through implication. Whatever position you have will be treated as the lesser, unsubstantiated proposition of an idiot who is too stupid to offer any intelligent information. Quite simply you waste time and energy attempting to engage them in debate. Better to offer your knowledge to observers who are not closed minded and who honestly seek information by which to come to a conclusion. If there are no observers for whom to contend and the liberal starts out saying you are a racist, sexist, bigot homophobe then you should not waste your effort and simply reply;“Since you judge me without knowing me then clearly your mind is too closed for intelligent thought and you are too stupid to be talking to me, so kiss my manly white ass and move on.” Distract – When a liberal realizes they are losing the argument they always change the subject. [ Look, there's ice melting somewhere. There's a typhoon in the Philippines and there's a drought somewhere else ... as if the weather is always supposed to be mild and balmy with gentle daily showers. And look, some frat boy used the N word .... there's a crime somewhere and private gun ownership didn't prevent it ..... blah blah blah. ] They will switch to something about which they believe you are wrong and move away from the subject that you have proven their assertions are in error. They do this deliberately in order to make you the one who is wrong and, once they prove you are wrong on the other subject you are assumed to be wrong on the original subject. The solution to this is to keep yanking the conversation back to the subject and not allow them to deviate and take control with a new subject. The new subject is irrelevant and the object of a different argument. Stick to the issue at hand!Deny – Once you have them cornered and there is no out for them so that their defeat is inescapable, their next defense is to deny that the facts are truthful or even matter. Like “hands up, don’t shoot,” proven to be a lie from the beginning, the liberal will say the truth doesn’t matter because the issue is that police shoot young black men, not that young black men commit twenty times more violent crime than any other demographic group. It is a simultaneous effort of deriding the facts, distracting from the subject, and denying the truth. Denial is an ugly thing and when a person closes their mind to the truth by rejecting all facts except those they choose they are regressive not progressive. For people who would rather accept what they are told without examining and weighing the facts to arrive at a truthful conclusion there is no hope of making any gains in teaching them. The person who thinks critically and examines the facts, the person who can be impressed by your argument is the observer. That is where your attention should shift as there is no longer any point in engaging the liberal who will then turn to the final tactic.Demonize – at the end of the argument when a liberal has been thoroughly defeated he will turn to demonizing his opponent. “Republicans are only for the greedy rich 1%.” “Republicans want the poor to stay poor.” “Republicans want to enslave blacks.” “Republicans want women to die in childbirth.” “Republicans want old people to die in the streets without healthcare.” Every attack gets worse as they attempt to convince the observer that Republicans are evil incarnate . There are people who believe all of this, who believe every piece of propaganda that is spewed at them and they will regurgitate it and vomit it back without thought. [ "To vomit it back without thought" ... I hereby deem the name for that is to "tejek." Tejek definition: to vomit leftist propaganda back without thought. ] Once they hit the demonization stage where they condemn good as evil it becomes clear that their minds are too far gone to help them understand. The people who gobble up propaganda are the most ignorant, self-righteous, hypocritical individuals. They are fanatically devoted to their beliefs and typically the ones who form mobs and riot . They are the 47% that Gov. Romney referred to in his condemnation of those who live off of government benefits without giving back to society because they believe they are entitled and deserving. They are the greedy, lazy poor who cheer when government steals from the rich. Just remember when engaging a liberal; their premise is always wrong, make them stick to the subject, keep to the truth, and show them up for the dysfunctional thinkers that they are and you will win over people who still think intelligently. A strong mind that engages in critical thought, one that has not been subverted, will see the light and move to the Right as they learn morality and maturity from a conservative who doesn’t let liberals take control of the narrative. Remember;“The Left is never right.” and“Like the Force, propaganda has a strong influence on the weak-minded.” In the crucible of political campaigns the truth is exposed by the tactics of the campaigners. Where Democrats throw mud at Republicans to obscure the truth, Republicans strive to dig out the truth about Democrats which they try to keep obscured. Democrats post articles claiming conservatives support liberal ideas, or want to take away people’s healthcare to poison the well of candidates for conservatives. While Republicans want to get to the bottom of Clinton’s Benghazi failure, taking campaign donations from Islamic countries, and Obama’s efforts to make millions of illegal aliens voters while using the IRS to steal from Americans . Both parties can be said to be attempting to poison the well of each other’s candidates, but there is a world of difference between liberal smears and conservatives revealing the truth. It is the responsibility of the citizen to dig out the facts and uncover the truth for themselves. Always remember that when they demonize the truth they are not acting for what is Good.................. http://liberalsbackwardsthink.com/2015/03/06/the-4d-nutwork-of-liberal-debate-deride-distract-deny-demonize/