Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Copper Fox -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mudguy who wrote (9353)	3/25/2015 8:34:50 PM
From: brundall	1 Recommendation Recommended By Hog Head Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10654

What I don't get is the almost complete lack of anger over the public video of Oct 24th 2013 (Commodities Dig) when the CEO stated that we had 3-4 years of cash left in the bank at that moment in time. Less than a year and a half later we were almost completely out of cash desperately waiting for a government rebate to stay afloat. How can a statement like that be made in the public domain without any repercussions? Oh yes, I know...57% insider control, that's how

To: mudguy who wrote (9353)	3/25/2015 8:49:46 PM
From: CanadaGrant	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10654

I stated this a long time ago. I am of the opinion that the land claims, port reservations and pretty much everything else was done at the asking of Teck to keep under the radar. What the hell good did a port reservation do for CUU or land claims they gave to Teck? So far it's like my example and opinion below: Hey! lets spend 80 million dollars of investors money, give it back to Teck for 20 million, then go on a drunken binge and blow our load on Carmax, sober up for the tax return and... now we sit. How else can you describe it?