Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bear Down who wrote (7522)	12/18/1997 4:11:00 PM
From: Ed Lamb	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20681

Michael, the times they are a changin when a naysayer comes to the rescue of a pom pomer. Michael a naxonian in the making ???? elamb

To: Bear Down who wrote (7522)	12/19/1997 8:07:00 AM
From: Jerry in Omaha	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20681

Mr. Grasso, A comment in a recent posting by Mr. Brasington seems to contradict my assertions re your suggestion for testing protocols. It seems it may be getting some, yet unspecified, support. This has led me to re-evaluate my reactions and comments. I can see merit in your approach when the objective would be to prove that the Johnson Process performs as advertised. However if the objective is to prove to the world that Franklin Lake is what we have advertised I don't believe the testing methods you suggest would be helpful for reasons already cited; i.e. we already know what happens during standard assays of Franklin Lake head ore - not much. That said, I'll be curious to see how this works out and will follow events, along with you I'm sure, as they unfold. Good job, Mr. G! Jerard P