Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Copper Fox -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: brundall who wrote (9398)	3/31/2015 9:32:48 PM
From: CanadaGrant	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10654

Prospekt on AG mentioned something kind of interesting in that they spent $316,000 and change on legal fees to some law firm to get the mining rebate. How about using a tax accountant for tax related items instead of a $316,000 lawyer? Maybe the fees for chasing unhappy shareholders here were included. Anybody get the feeling this is some sort of good old boy network that we accidentally invested in? "My companies since day one have never made a nickle but, I have...." That sort of shit? My opinion is that Elmer makes quite a bit plus his board stuff and other goings on but has never made actual money on a sale of anything or a development for anyone at any time in the past. I sure wish someone would correct me if I am wrong but I can't find a success story anywhere on this guy. Another little item I should have looked up before I invested is that I was under the impression that negative copper costs and Salazar would have superseded sleeze but the first two were never true in the first place....