SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (847106)4/2/2015 3:20:56 PM
From: Bill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576216
 
Could the law be any clearer?

No employer having employees subject to any provisions of this section [section 206 of title 29 of the United States Code] shall discriminate, within any establishment in which such employees are employed, between employees on the basis of sex by paying wages to employees in such establishment at a rate less than the rate at which he pays wages to employees of the opposite sex in such establishment for equal work on jobs[,] the performance of which requires equal skill, effort, and responsibility, and which are performed under similar working conditions, except where such payment is made pursuant to (i) a seniority system; (ii) a merit system; (iii) a system which measures earnings by quantity or quality of production; or (iv) a differential based on any other factor other than sex.



To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (847106)4/2/2015 3:24:08 PM
From: Bill  Respond to of 1576216
 
Why are there bank robberies? Don't we have laws against it? Should we have more laws against it?



To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (847106)4/2/2015 3:25:04 PM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 1576216
 
Why is sheperd a trolling mind-numbed leftwing robot?