SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Brumar89 who wrote (847913)4/6/2015 1:36:13 AM
From: Wharf Rat  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576645
 
Here's a twofer you'll like... crimes against humanity, plus death threats by friends of the criminals.

Is misinformation about the climate science criminally negligent? Lawrence Torcello

In researching my previous debate blogpost I came onto the story of Professor Lawrence Torcello in an article at the Union of Concerned Scientist blog (Yeah, they are on the Republican enemies list too, it's tough not to be). Torcello finally enunciated something I've been struggling with and that's at the heart of all these posts I keep putting up.


How should society contend with those who knowingly disseminate misinformation about climate science.


It started with an article he wrote for 'The Conversation' where he discussed the Italian trial of geologists in the wake of the 2009 earthquake. There's no point in retelling it since his Conversation article does a better job and thanks to their Creative Commons License I have permission to reprint all of it. Following that I've included the full text of the Union of Concerned Scientists article. I've added some highlights.
Food for thought.
____________________________________________________________________




The Conversation
https://theconversation.com/is-misinformation-about-the-climate-criminally-negligent-23111


Lawrence Torcello | March 13, 2014
Is misinformation about the climate criminally negligent?




The importance of clearly communicating science to the public should not be underestimated. Accurately understanding our natural environment and sharing that information can be a matter of life or death. When it comes to global warming, much of the public remains in denial about a set of facts that the majority of scientists clearly agree on. With such high stakes, an organised campaign funding misinformation ought to be considered criminally negligent....




Hate Mail Barrage Reveals Climate Disinformation’s Dark Side
ucsusa.org



Got Science? | April 2014 | Union of Concerned Scientists Publications






Lawrence Torcello, a philosophy professor at the Rochester Institute of Technology, never imagined he would become the focus of a vicious barrage of hate mail when, last month, he published an article in a British online journal about the ethics of climate change misinformation.


But, sure enough, in recent weeks, Torcello has been subjected to death threats, racial slurs, anti-gay and anti-Semitic epithets. He’s been called a fascist, a Stalinist, a Nazi and a communist. One of the many contemptible emails he received, for example, reads simply: “DIE you maggot.” An anonymous phone message ominously threatens that he’ll “be paid a visit.” In all, Torcello estimates that he has been subjected to more than 700 harassing calls, emails and tweets....


whatsupwiththatwatts.blogspot.com