SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (848367)4/13/2015 9:47:04 AM
From: Brumar89  Respond to of 1576909
 
Since you're obsessed with envy over hedge fund mgrs.:

Two hedge fund managers walk into a bar
Morgan Housel, The Motley Fool 9:03 a.m. EST March 2, 2015

This conversation has probably happened somewhere.

Two hedge fund managers walk into a bar. They need a drink.

Their returns are terrible. Their investors are mad. And they know they're in good company.

They're here to figure out what's wrong with their industry.

"Whisky, please," Jim says.

"There are 10,000 hedge funds in the world," Jim says to his friend, Paul. "Every one is run by a guy who thinks he's George Soros. No one thinks of himself as a mediocre hedge fund manager. Everyone thinks they're the Stephen Hawking of finance."

"Here's the problem," Jim continues. "Most of us went to the same schools, were taught the same theories by the same textbooks, worked at the same investment bank, read the same newspapers, and live in the same zip code. We take money from the same investors who demand the same short-term performance."

"Yet we deeply – deeply -- believe we have an edge over everyone else."

"It's Lake Wobegon on stilts," Paul says.

"A lot of us are smart people. Brilliant, actually. But when 10,000 people fight for the same prize in the same market, the results are totally predictable."

One dollar invested in the Barclay Hedge Fund Index in 2004 would worth be worth $1.88 by 2014. In the S&P 500 (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC ) , it would have grown to $2.32.

"Here's the problem. Most hedge funds are indistinguishable from mutual funds, other than the fact that they feel entitled to charge 30 times the fees."

"Two percent of assets for showing up in the morning, and 20% of any profits."

"There are probably 100 hedge funds that will consistently beat the market after fees. They won't take your money. They provide just enough hope for investors to keep the rest of us in business. We earn half the performance of index funds, charge 30 times the fees of mutual funds, pay half the income tax rates of school teachers, have triple the ego of rock stars, and fewer disclosure requirements than the NSA."

"We're basically a conduit between public pension funds and Greenwich real estate agents."

"Cheers to that."

"Part of the problem is there are so few barriers to entry in this business. You have to be drafted to play in the NBA. But any hooligan can start a hedge fund."

"And call themselves the next LeBron James."

"And convince investors they should be paid like a champ."

"Exactly."

Both take another drink.

"What do you tell clients who are upset with your performance?"

"We tell them we're not trying to beat the market. We're trying to manage risk."

"Jim, seriously, what the hell does that mean?" Paul asks.

Jim throws back his third whisky and bursts out laughing.

"Managing risk ... haha ... managing ri.... phhtt.... haha!"

Both cackle hysterically.

"Every time an investor asks why our returns are so bad I tell them 'we're managing risk,' and they shut up," Jim says.

"You convince them that we have less downside risk than the market. So even though your returns are terrible, you can tell them you have excellent risk-adjusted returns. Throw in some formulas with Greek symbols, and they'll leave you alone."

"Half of our investors are pension funds. They don't need most of their money for decades. Earning low returns is the biggest risk they can take. But we've convinced them that they're better off earning low returns in exchange for minimal downside risk."

"Wasn't your fund down like 57% in 2008?" Paul asks.

"Black swan, bro. Not my fault."

"I started using this line on my wife," Paul jokes. "Honey, I know the kitchen is a mess, but I'm managing risk."

"If you can dream it, you can do it ... in risk-adjusted terms. I'm pretty sure Walt Disney said that."

Jim spills a beer on his lap.

"In risk-adjusted terms your pants are still dry!" Paul yells, laughing uncontrollably. "Here's a bonus!"

"Look, you can get a lower volatility portfolio by putting 60% of your money in Vanguard stock funds and 40% in Vanguard bond funds," Jim explains. "This strategy has beaten most hedge funds with lower volatility. You pay basically nothing in fees. Everyone knows this."

"But how many Vanguard fund managers own a Gulfstream V?"

"I rest my case."

http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2015/02/19/two-hedge-fund-managers-walk-into-a-bar/23678119/



To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (848367)4/13/2015 2:10:11 PM
From: Brumar89  Respond to of 1576909
 
Chelsea’s Invisible Hand

Another way for rich to curry favor w/ Clintons: Invest in son-in-law’s hedge fund? Mickey Kaus

An inside report on the shadowy role of Hillary’s most important adviser.

By KENNETH P. VOGEL

April 12, 2015

Rafanelli Events Management, Inc. also planned fundraising galas for the Clinton Foundation, and, according to Federal Election Commission filings, was paying $1,200 a month in rent to Hillary Clinton’s still idling presidential campaign committee, which had relocated from its Northern Virginia headquarters to an office in downtown Washington.

At the time, a spokeswoman for Rafanelli Events told Politico that the company “worked on several events with Hillary and actually we’re working with her down in D.C. right now on some events for her with the State Department. We got the connection to the State Department through her.”

Less than eight months after the wedding, Mark Walsh, Rafanelli’s personal and business partner, became deputy chief of protocol at Clinton’s State Department—a $179,700-a-year post. While that office oversees payments for state dinners like those that Rafanelli Events produces for the Obama White House, Walsh maintained a stake in Rafanelli Events worth as much as $1 million, according to a disclosure he filed in late 2012. Walsh, who directed LGBT outreach for Clinton’s campaign, promised the State Department he would recuse himself from decisions relating to the company.

Rafanelli, who had bundled more than $100,000 in contributions for Hillary Clinton’s 2008 presidential campaign, declined to comment for this story. But he told a Boston magazine in 2010 that “when Hillary went to the State Department, D.C. became a good secondary market.”

Meanwhile, all of the wedding attention raised security concerns for Chelsea, who was no longer eligible for Secret Service protection. An incident around the time of her wedding, when Chelsea was swarmed by a crowd, heightened concerns, according to sources familiar with the situation. At her own expense, Chelsea Clinton hired a security firm to occasionally provide personal protection, and for some events, arrives with a driver and escort from T & M Protective Resources, a firm that also provides security around the Clinton Foundation’s events, according to people familiar with the arrangement. They say the firm’s services can run into the tens of thousands of dollars. It’s run partly by the former Secret Service agent who was in charge of her parents’ protective detail when her father was president and then when her mother was in the Senate.

While Chelsea still takes New York City’s subway from time to time, the surge in interest in her around the wedding made her realize that she had a celebrity’s platform and caused her to re-evaluate her life. She committed to using her platform to advocate for her causes, such as advancing women and girls, and boosting public health, her focus for a master’s degree from Columbia University (where she continues to teach the subject).

As her chief of staff Bari Lurie told Fast Company, “She quickly realized, ‘There is nothing I’m doing now that’s satiating this interest. This doing-nothing thing: I’ve tried it, and it didn’t work.’”

***

Even as Chelsea Clinton increasingly devoted herself to public service, she and her husband Marc prominently rubbed shoulders with New York’s rich and famous. They became fixtures on the society scene, where they impressed the city’s elite.

“I saw a lot of Hillary in her and a lot of Bill in him,” recalled one dinner partner of a night out with the high-voltage young couple.

Mezvinsky clearly bonded with his father-in-law, and he sometimes shows up with Bill Clinton at sporting events or Clinton Foundation poker tournaments. At the same time, he’s been building up a hedge fund with wealthy investors, including some of the deep-pocketed funders of the Clinton donor network.

Indeed, when Mezvinsky and his partners co-founded the hedge fund Eaglevale Partners in 2012, word spread quickly among Clinton backers on Wall Street that the family would look favorably on investments in it, according to one major New York Democratic donor, who works in the finance sector.

For example, billionaire media mogul Haim Saban, who has donated as much as $25 million to the Clinton Foundation and whose wife sits on its board, has told people that he invested Eaglevale, sources tell Politico. A spokesman for Saban Capital Group said via email “our company policy does not allow me to confirm and/or comment on any of Mr. Saban’s personal investments.” Saban, who has pledged his “full might” to electing Hillary Clinton and is planning a fundraiser for her next month in Los Angeles, tried to pay Bill Clinton as a consultant, but his wife’s State Department vetoed the arrangement because of Saban’s involvement in foreign policy advocacy.

Among the other rich donors to the Clintons’ foundation or their campaigns who also are Eaglevale investors are Lasry and his brother-in-law, Craig Effron, as well as the British investment banker Jacob Rothschild, according to reports in The Wall Street Journal and The New York Times. The overlap between Eaglevale investors and Clinton donors “shows the fine line the Clinton family must navigate as their charitable and business endeavors come under scrutiny in an election cycle,” wrote the Times.

Patricof, who said he discussed the fund with Mezvinsky but did not invest in it, suggested the son-in-law did not need the Clinton name to succeed in finance. “Marc is a very smart young man. I’m sure he’ll do very well in his field, also. They’re a good team,” said Patricof, who has donated as much as $250,000 to the Clinton Foundation and $32,000 to the various Clinton campaigns.

Lasry called Mezvinsky “an exceptionally smart guy.” Though Eaglevale has struggled to return significant profits, losing big on an investment in Greek bonds, Lasry said he still has confidence in Mezvinsky. “I liked what he was doing with Greece. There was risk involved, but if Greece was staying in the Eurozone, and wasn’t having these issues, we all would be making a fortune,” Lasry said. “It’s turned out to be the reverse, but that’s life.”

Read more: http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/04/hillary-clinton-2016-chelsea-116910_Page3.html#ixzz3XDCLonBI