Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (850374)	4/16/2015 5:18:48 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1573048

CJ, from the NYTimes article: At the center of the debate is the murky question of the ultimate ambitions of the leaders in Tehran. There is no dispute among American, Israeli and European intelligence officials that Iran has been enriching nuclear fuel and developing some necessary infrastructure to become a nuclear power. But the Central Intelligence Agency and other intelligence agencies believe that Iran has yet to decide whether to resume a parallel program to design a nuclear warhead — a program they believe was essentially halted in 2003 and which would be necessary for Iran to build a nuclear bomb. Iranian officials maintain that their nuclear program is for civilian purposes. Check out the words "parallel program." In geometry, parallel lines ran in the same direction. There is no reason Iran wants to pursue a nuclear research program if it cannot be applied toward weaponization or other project that would increase Iran's influence in geopolitical affairs. And considering the fact that Iran is already waging proxy wars against Israel, and the fact that Iranians continue to shout "Death to America" and "Death to Israel," I think it's clear what Iran's intentions are with its nuclear research program. Tenchusatsu