SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Dell Technologies Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jim Patterson who wrote (25684)12/18/1997 9:33:00 PM
From: Meathead  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 176387
 
No, really. I've been following closely for years. The
stock drop was due to the entire re-tooling of the Notebook
line. If you do the research for that time period,
you'll see exactly how the situation transpired.

MEATHEAD



To: Jim Patterson who wrote (25684)12/18/1997 10:09:00 PM
From: Meathead  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 176387
 
Jim, Why do you believe that Dell should discontinue it's
currency hedging practices (they've modified them since they
got in trouble)? Why also should they stop
selling puts and buying calls to facilitate cheaper and
more predictable (budgetable) stock buybacks. What strategy
would you use to protect your company from currency
fluctuations or buy back stock at lower average prices?

MEATHEAD



To: Jim Patterson who wrote (25684)12/18/1997 11:02:00 PM
From: hpeace  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 176387
 
Jim, dell was using derivtives in their purest form on the period we are talking about....
there is absolutley nothing worng with hedging currency in the period AFTER you sell it and when you collect. This is the exposure.
You sold large amt. to corp and the rate was 100 to $.
Now if they send you 100 yen 60 days later and it's now worth 120 to 1$. then unless you hedged..you just lost 20% of your profit...
that's it , you lost everything on that one...
So, what do you mean they shouldn't hedge.
To do this you need to actually deploy the instrument before you make the sale but to the plan ....
Not overly optimistic or under plan.
This is basically what they do now...
I don't think anyone would describe dells hedging as risky now...
If you have printed facts on this..i would like to see them.
they are in their edgar filings on any analsyt reports..
If you are refering to their losses on hedging or small gains...
this is what should happen if it's donw correctly...
now if they were making 10 mm or losig 10mm. then i would agree with you...
but this isn't the case.
i posted a complete summary of their gains and losses going back to 1992...except for their dirivitives that were wild in 92 or so..
they are okay now....

But, I'll look at any FACT you post... but it's time for facts not just opinions...he just say " I think and don't have any facts"
That's a good acceptable answer.



To: Jim Patterson who wrote (25684)12/18/1997 11:57:00 PM
From: Boplicity  Respond to of 176387
 
<<His stock fell 70% and the company almost got into serious financial trouble. The move into retail stores was another hugh financial mistake>>

Lets not forget the DELL hedge mistake also.

Greg