Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (851073)	4/19/2015 11:37:46 PM
From: Greg or e	3 Recommendations Recommended By joseffy PKRBKR TideGlider Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1577541

DeGrasse Tyson to Journalists: Don't Question Scientists or Climate Change "He even encouraged journalists not to offer another side to the story because there is no debate when it comes to "emergent scientific truths."" truthrevolt.org

To: i-node who wrote (851073)	4/27/2015 8:38:53 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1577541

97% (or something like that), do agree. Of course what they agree with is that Earth has warmed and that human activity has played a role in this warming. That isn't the same as "human caused emissions of CO2 are the overwhelming reason for warming and will lead to a massive civilization threatening disaster if such emissions are not greatly reduced soon".

To: i-node who wrote (851073)	4/28/2015 1:58:49 AM
From: combjelly	Respond to of 1577541

No Fringe like that humans cannot possibly have a role in the CO2 increase in the atmosphere. And even if they did, it cannot possibly influence the climate. And Tyndall's work on the greenhouse effect has never been tested in the lab. Or the fringe science of expecting that if you increase the cost of labor somehow, mysteriously, the demand for it will increase? And then there is stuff like this. No one has made that claim. The fundamental question behind this is how elastic the demand for labor is. You seem to be of the opinion that it is very elastic. Studies have shown that isn't the case. Or at least isn't the case when the cost of labor moves up relatively slowly.