SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mongo2116 who wrote (853352)4/30/2015 4:08:58 PM
From: jlallen1 Recommendation

Recommended By
locogringo

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1574854
 
Specifically, which ones are not facts.....

Is there anything in that post that you can refute....or is this just more of your usual asstalk?

How did you get to be so ignorant?



To: Mongo2116 who wrote (853352)4/30/2015 4:11:07 PM
From: Broken_Clock  Respond to of 1574854
 
Guess Who Predicted The Failure Of QE


Submitted by Tyler Durden on 04/30/2015 15:15 -0400

Bond Janet Yellen Japan Monetary Base Monetary Policy Quantitative Easing Unemployment


Janet Yellen:

"As Japan found during its quantitative easing program, increasing the size of the monetary base above levels needed to provide ample liquidity to the banking system had no discernible economic effects aside from those associated with communicating the Bank of Japan’s commitment to the zero interest rate policy.



I think my views on this mirror those that you expressed in your opening comments, Mr. Chairman."

- FOMC Minutes from Dec 2008





How did that work out?

We assume principles go out the window when the orders come down from the banker-owners on high...

* * *

However, today we get more total hypocrisy from the newly found bond guru and hedge fund adviser via his blog...

Responding to The Wall Street Journal's questioning the efficacy of monetary policy (specifically ZIRP and QE), Bernanke scoffs:

Where [monetary policy] can be helpful is in supporting the return to full employment, and there the record has been reasonably good. Indeed, it seems clear that the Fed's aggressive actions are an important reason that job creation in the United States has outstripped that of other industrial countries by a wide margin.



The WSJ also argues that, because monetary policy has not been a panacea for our economic troubles, we should stop using it. I agree that monetary policy is no panacea, and as Fed chairman I frequently said so. With short-term interest rates pinned near zero, monetary policy is not as powerful or as predictable as at other times. But the right inference is not that we should stop using monetary policy, but rather that we should bring to bear other policy tools as well.

So while in 2008, QE had no discernible economic effects... in 2015 it is a powerful tool for lowering unemployment rates? What a farce!?