SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: JohnM who wrote (272032)5/4/2015 2:15:21 PM
From: T L Comiskey  Respond to of 540748
 
re fanaticism.....

Correct imo

most dont
bother to read and practice The Teachings...
these fanatics are therefore..confused at best....At Best



To: JohnM who wrote (272032)5/4/2015 3:26:44 PM
From: epicure  Respond to of 540748
 
Then we disagree. People who stake real world outcomes on fantasy are a problem in my world. It's not just religious fanaticism. Religious thinking influences thinking- even when people are not fanatics. I'm not going to be PC and pretend fantasy thinking doesn't bleed into other areas of thinking- because all the studies I've read show that it does. And that's a problem- for people who want real world based scientific answers to problems.

www.researchgate.net/...religious.../0deec51f2a8c571284000000.pdf

An analytic cognitive style denotes a propensity to set aside highly salient intuitions when
engaging in problem solving. We assess the hypothesis that an analytic cognitive style is
associated with a history of questioning, altering, and rejecting (i.e., unbelieving) supernatural
claims, both religious and paranormal. In two studies, we examined associations of
God beliefs, religious engagement (attendance at religious services, praying, etc.), conventional
religious beliefs (heaven, miracles, etc.) and paranormal beliefs (extrasensory perception,
levitation, etc.) with performance measures of cognitive ability and analytic
cognitive style. An analytic cognitive style negatively predicted both religious and paranormal
beliefs when controlling for cognitive ability as well as religious engagement, sex, age,
political ideology, and education. Participants more willing to engage in analytic reasoning
were less likely to endorse supernatural beliefs. Further, an association between analytic
cognitive style and religious engagement was mediated by religious beliefs, suggesting that
an analytic cognitive style negatively affects religious engagement via lower acceptance of
conventional religious beliefs
. Results for types of God belief indicate that the association
between an analytic cognitive style and God beliefs is more nuanced than mere acceptance
and rejection, but also includes adopting less conventional God beliefs, such as Pantheism
or Deism. Our data are consistent with the idea that two people who share the same cognitive
ability, education, political ideology, sex, age and level of religious engagement can
acquire very different