SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The 56 Point TA; Charts With an Attitude -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Esteban who wrote (9470)12/19/1997 1:33:00 PM
From: ivan solotaroff  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 79383
 
A DIFFERENCE OF STYLE

Esteban,

Re: "After a signal day, these stocks are more likely to gap up than down."

It's the "more likely" that I can't deal with. Insofar as NOT buying before the close of the signal day: The only risk to your POSSIBLE reward potential that I see is if it gaps up, and even then you have a good POSSIBLE buying opportunity--AFTER the retest and, perhaps, a filling in of the gaps. Other than the gap, there's nothing stopping you from getting in close to the bottom of a good move the day after the signal day.
We're kinda going back and forth on the same issue and not getting anywhere, except for amplifying the fact that I want mostly to reduce risk and you want mostly to increase opportunities.
Re: "Do we still consider it a valid signal day when the reason for the signal is obviously not stock specific?"
While I'm not sure that I know what you mean by "stock specific," I would say Definitely yes. The whole notion behind TA is that you can't really know "stock-specific" info, only the insiders do. You learn by watching the chart what THEY think. Sometimes they're wrong. In the case of a PGDCEB they might even be wrong more than is usually the case, or it wouldn't have the B in there in the first place.
Glad you got out with small damage, and please, keep posting. I'm not generating many posts these days because I'm busy, but I can definitely respond.

Ivan