Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (181594)	5/20/2015 6:12:25 PM
From: longnshort	Respond to of 224755

if you keep lowering the past temps that's gonna happen

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (181594)	5/20/2015 6:16:32 PM
From: Bill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224755

No it's not.

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (181594)	5/20/2015 7:04:27 PM
From: Sedohr Nod	1 Recommendation Recommended By TideGlider Respond to of 224755

The Bush did it......maybe if you repeat that message ANOTHER 20 times, some of us will finally understand....Back on earth, we missed a late May freeze this morning by a couple degrees.

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (181594)	5/20/2015 10:09:04 PM
From: weatherguru	1 Recommendation Recommended By TideGlider Respond to of 224755

It would be nice if that were true. The Earth would be a better place if it were warmer. You are referring to a completely fabricated trend. NOAA admits they tamper and adjust data right on their website. Here's a plot that proves it. They cool the past and warm the present. If the globe is really warming, where's the proof in the lapse rate? Warmers are looking hard, and even after years of torturing the data with an already reached "the conclusion", they still can't find long-term, significant changes in the lapse rate. So, the only proof of man-made global warming is that the global warming signal below is man-made. Q.E.D.