SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Michael Coley who wrote (40800)12/19/1997 12:32:00 PM
From: John Solder  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 58324
 
Volume Update:

1st Hour - ?????
2nd Hour - ?????
3rd Hour - ?????

22 3/4 as of 12:10 2.9 MM traded. Via Bloomberg 15 min delay.

Come on Gary, bring back the Love.
Now that Rocky's long I'm sure he's interested in intra-day vols. too.



To: Michael Coley who wrote (40800)12/19/1997 12:33:00 PM
From: Rocky Reid  Respond to of 58324
 
>>Actually, a P133 is a pretty typical PC configuration. <<

His is not an Intel chip. It's probably either a Cyrix or AMD. He states it runs at the equivalent of a Intel Pentium 90, which is behind the curve a bit.



To: Michael Coley who wrote (40800)12/19/1997 12:36:00 PM
From: Fred J. Ledo  Respond to of 58324
 
I really hope IOM come in at or above numbers.

Look what happened to COMS. Report today, Lawsuit today.

A shareholder lawsuit would thoroughly distract from the fundamentals. This is a huge buying opp. just before earnings and a split. I know a lot of buyers couldn't wait to get in IOM at 29 and above to play the earnings/split. Wouldn't you want to get in even more at these levels.

fred



To: Michael Coley who wrote (40800)12/19/1997 1:09:00 PM
From: AreWeThereYet  Respond to of 58324
 
Michael >> Actually, a P133 is a pretty typical PC configuration <<

Read more carefully, his is a 5x86 133Mhz not a P5! But again I don't think there is any different on the result performance. But his test result is not valid because he did not mention the source and target destination and multitasking involved... I am sure EIDE can do much much more than 800k/s.

aC