To: tejek who wrote (860071 ) 5/26/2015 2:35:59 PM From: i-node 3 RecommendationsRecommended By Brumar89 one_less TimF
Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576876 That's the thing cross country, hi speed rail doesn't have to be non stop. It can done much like airlines with certain cities serving as hubs. Hubs in NYC, Chicago and SFO with smaller hubs in say Cleveland and Denver would get people across the northern part of the country. And a similar line could exist in the South......hubs in either DC or Atlanta, Dallas, and LA with smaller hubs in say NOLA or Nashville and Phoenix. Each hub city would have feeder lines from neighboring cities. The US and China are both about the same size physically and China has had no problem developing cross country lines. It is this simple: The cost to set up a workable high speed rail network is insanely high. You have to know, before you spend that money, that people will ride it. All of the accumulated evidence we have suggests they will not. You can take the most transportation limited place in America, where I live -- with the only accessible airport requiring multiple hops to get anywhere at all, and there is a train that runs from where I live to San Antonio and requires maybe about 14 hours. That's not six hours, no it isn't. But it is cheap and will get the job done. I've ridden that train multiple times and it is EMPTY for a good bit of the ride. EMPTY as in you are liable to be the only one in the rail car. There is no evidence at all the massive cost of high speed rail would change this. And we cannot afford it anyway; SS, Medicare and Obamacare have left the country flat broke and no real chance to dig out of it. I just don't understand where you get the idea we can spend money on stuff like this.