To: Shane M who wrote (55360 ) 5/27/2015 8:18:22 PM From: Mattyice Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 78751 Shane - Interesting on the retention nugget. It does seem to be ignored in the investment pitch and more emphasis placed on employee retention thus being able to keep expenses/R&D/Cost of float down. I also agree with you on people shopping for policies, I don't believe this happens as much as people suggest. I for one as a young guy dont mess with it, not worth my time. I do like the concept the pitch mentions of '$1 of earnings converting to $1 of market value' ie emphasis on conservatively growing bookvalue. I ran couple of different quick scenarios one with growth of 5% (left) and growth of 2% (right) and adjusting for risk with higher cost of capital than probably what is needed (also compared with very conservative graham number). The stock seems undervalued to fairly valued which usually when i run these especially in past few years I am no where close - usually trading way above. Reinvestment Rate 29.83% Reinvestment Rate 11.93% EBIT / EV 13% Value of Operating Assets 31893 Value of Operating Assets 12189 EBITDA / EV 13% + Cash 2,149 + Cash 2,149 FCF / EV - Debt 2,165 - Debt 2,165 Value of Equity 31877 Value of Equity 12173 Per Share 54 Per Share 21 Current Share Price 27 Current Share Price 27 GN 24 GN 24 MKT CAP 16000 # of shares 589 EV 16,016
I also like the fact that If I invest 16,000 today (16 bil Enterprise Value) I can pretty much guarantee that I'll get 1,600 in EBIT (current EBIT 2,000) on a yearly basis assuming no brand erosion which i suppose is what we are discussing. But I'm not going to lie that is pretty good deal. I'm not getting that with my cash pile sitting in my bank.