SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Wharf Rat who wrote (861217)5/31/2015 2:41:22 PM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575946
 
EPA pushes forward with biofuels
Eric Worrall / 2 hours ago May 31, 2015

Guest essay by Eric Worrall

Biofeul life cycle Image: LLBL.gov

US investment in biofuels are to be expanded under proposals advanced by the US EPA.

Under the proposed rule announced Friday, the amount of ethanol in the gasoline supply would increase in coming years, just not as much as set out under federal law. That approach drew criticism from ethanol and farm groups that have pushed to keep high volumes of ethanol in gasoline.

Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton has called for a robust renewable fuels standard while campaigning in Iowa, host of the leadoff presidential caucuses next year.



In a bid to ethanol producers, the administration also announced Friday that the Agriculture Department will invest up to $100 million to help improve infrastructure for delivering ethanol to cars, such as fuel pumps capable of supplying higher blends of renewable fuel.

Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/epa-proposes-lowering-amount-ethanol-gas-143928039–finance.html

When will this madness to stop? Even green journalists like George Monbiot, and former members of the UN like Jean Ziegler, people who believe wholeheartedly in the alleged dangers of anthropogenic climate change, think biofuels are a crime against humanity.

Burning hundreds of millions of tonnes of staple foods to produce biofuels is a crime against humanity. Since 2007, the EU and US governments have given lavish support to agribusinesses to fill car fuel tanks with food – compulsory targets, and tax breaks and subsidies(pdf) worth billions annually. The result? Increased hunger, land grabbing, environmental damage and, ultimately, hundreds of thousands of lives lost.



EU policies promoting biofuels have, since 2008, diverted crops out of food markets at the bidding of powerful agribusinesses, in their pursuit of private profit. This use of large quantities of food and commodity crops for relatively small amounts of transport fuel has had three disastrous consequences.

First is an increase in world hunger. Almost all biofuels used in Europe are made from crops, such as wheat, soy, palm oil, rapeseed and maize, that are essential food sources for a rapidly expanding global population. Europe now burns enough food calories in fuel tanks every year to feed 100 million people.

Read more: http://www.theguardian.com/global-development/poverty-matters/2013/nov/26/burning-food-crops-biofuels-crime-humanity

If there is ever a reckoning, a demand by victims of green policies for redress for the injustice and brutality they have suffered, at the hands of well meaning fools, the biofuel lunacy will surely top the list of wrongs to be righted.

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/05/31/epa-pushes-forward-with-biofuels/



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (861217)5/31/2015 2:49:51 PM
From: Brumar891 Recommendation

Recommended By
FJB

  Respond to of 1575946
 
The Consumer's Temple



Yeltsin at a Randall's in Clear Lake TX

They have been credited with creating America’s middle class and blamed for obesity and global warming. They sparked innovations like the bar code, frozen foods and fresh year-round produce. They popularized self-service–and with it mass merchandising and competitive pricing. They created a culture of instant gratification and that uniquely American being: the smart shopper.

Supermarkets are a daily testimonial to the transformative power of capitalism. Few 20th century innovations have had such an impact on the way we live. In his autobiography, former Russian President Boris Yeltsin described his first visit to a Houston supermarket this way: “When I saw those shelves crammed with hundreds, thousands of cans, cartons and goods of every possible sort, I felt quite frankly sick with despair for the Soviet people.”

Before 1930, most staples required separate, daily trips to the butcher, baker, produce stand and milk man. Mom-and-pop grocery stores generally carried only one brand of any specific item and products were selected by a clerk behind a counter. In rural areas, grocers dispatched so-called huckster wagons to the country to sell canned goods and prepared foods, and customers were dependent on when these wagons arrived and what they carried.

The process was erratic, labor intensive and costly. In 1930, Americans spent 21% of their disposable income on groceries. By 1940, that percentage dropped to 16%. Today, that figure is less than 6%–thanks to innovations in food distribution, mass merchandising and price competition that began in the 1930s.

“Supermarkets made it possible to achieve economies of scale at a lower cost to consumers,” says Leslie G. Sarasin, chief executive of the Food Marketing Institute. “Americans were able to spend more of their disposable income on cars, education, clothing. They effectively created America’s middle class.”

The ’30s get a bad rap these days–as if the decade was nothing more than a bleak parade of dust bowls, breadlines and homeless men. But the decade also held the dawn of a new consumer-driven economy. Supermarkets led the way to affordable pricing, overwhelming variety and convenience.

Michael J. Cullen is credited with inventing the supermarket. In 1930, Cullen, a branch manager for Kroger Grocery & Bakery Co. in Illinois, addressed a letter to headquarters outlining a revolution in food retailing. He foresaw stores “monstrous in size” that operated 80% of their business on a self-service basis.

He suggested locations three blocks from town centers to reduce overhead and accommodate parking space. Cullen anticipated greater use of the automobile and home refrigeration would allow customers to abandon daily trips to the butcher, baker etc
., in lieu of weekly trips to the supermarket–where everything could be purchased under one roof. By doing more business than a hundred neighborhood stores, Kroger could sell groceries at rock-bottom prices.

“Can you imagine how the public would respond to a store of this kind?” Cullen wrote to Kroger’s vice president. “It would be a riot. I would have to call out the police and let the public in so many at a time. I would lead the public out of the high-priced houses of bondage into the low prices of the house of the promised land.”

When Kroger ignored Cullen, he resigned and on Aug. 4, 1930, he opened the world’s first-ever supermarket, King Kullen Grocery Co. , in Queens, N.Y. His slogan, “King Kullen, the world’s greatest price wrecker,” enticed thrifty consumers. His motto, “Pile it high; sell it cheap” was simple–and effective. [ I think that was Sam Walton's motto too. ]

Within two years, Cullen was operating eight markets and generating $6 million in sales ($76.4 million in 2009 dollars). When he died in 1936, there were 17 King Kullen markets operating throughout the Northeast. Cullen’s first real competitor, Elizabeth, N.J.-based Big Bear opened its first self-service supermarket on Dec. 4, 1932. That first year, Big Bear grossed $3.8 million in sales ($48.4 million in 2009 dollars).

Meanwhile, Cullen’s old bosses at Kroger kicked themselves. In 1933, William Albers, Kroger’s former president, left Kroger to open Albers Super Market in Cincinnati–the first store to use the word “supermarket.” That same year, Kroger built its first 75-space parking lot around one of its stores. Soon supermarkets were cropping up from coast to coast. By 1939, there were 4,982 supermarkets in operation.

So began the era of consumer choice. Self-service unleashed mass merchandising. No longer at the mercy of wholesalers to get their products on shelves, food manufacturers went directly to the supermarket–and the consumer–to get their brand noticed. Manufacturers vied for shelf space and lower prices. The market for food packaging and advertising exploded. As early as 1932, the food industry ranked second among manufacturers in annual expenditures for national magazine ads.

“Human food requirements and preferences have undergone revolutionary changes,” C.M. Chester Jr., president of General Foods, told Forbes Magazine in 1930. “The American factory worker is now better fed than were the kings of the 18th century.”

http://www.forbes.com/2009/04/30/1930s-advertising-innovation-business-supermarket.html



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (861217)5/31/2015 2:55:08 PM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575946
 
Elon Musk has gotten $4.9B in government supports:

By the Los Angeles Times' reckoning, Elon Musk's Tesla Motors, SolarCity, and SpaceX together have benefited from an estimated $4.9 billion in government support. The figure compiled by The Times, explains reporter Jerry Hirsch, comprises a variety of government incentives, including grants, tax breaks, factory construction, discounted loans and environmental credits that Tesla can sell. It also includes tax credits and rebates to buyers of solar panels and electric cars. "He definitely goes where there is government money," said an equity research analyst. "Musk and his companies' investors enjoy most of the financial upside of the government support, while taxpayers shoulder the cost," Hirsch adds. "The payoff for the public would come in the form of major pollution reductions, but only if solar panels and electric cars break through as viable mass-market products. For now, both remain niche products for mostly well-heeled customers." And as Musk moves into a new industry — battery-based home energy storage — Hirsch notes Tesla has already secured a commitment of $126 million in California subsidies to companies developing energy storage technology.

http://yro.slashdot.org/story/15/05/31/045246/how-elon-musks-growing-empire-is-fueled-by-government-subsidies?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&utm_medium=feed

How much is too much? $20 billion? $200 billion?